Finally a more nuanced, reasonable view of this question.
Is it just Western leftwingers that are sounding the alarm on the untrustworthyness of the rising populist right-wing?
I don't belong to that camp and say the same.
Have you heard Trump and others of his kinds promises? What are they other than complete demagogues?
I thus suspect that - hypothetically, if Trump were to become POTUS again, and other such ideological governments were to arise in Europe - when push comes to shove, Western economies will be much weaker than promised, and at the key moment Western opposition to anti-US/USD hegemony will be at least the same, if not stronger/bolder than today's.
Lastly, remember that also that while these people oppose assisting this Ukrainian regime, they support Israel in literally everything. So who could they represent other than the Anti-Christ?
As a Dutch PhD currently in Russia with a deep appreciation for its culture, I question why the West is often categorised narrowly and why Russia is depicted mechanically in this article with soo many assumptions. Berdyaev noted that Westerners misunderstand Russia due to their short-sighted idealism, which seems reflected here. Despite differing strategic interests, such as those of Orban, why categorize nations as “the enemy” instead of evaluating each on its own terms? Some leadership positions may indeed become fragile, and while I also hope the LGBTQ+ movement ages like the Woodstock movement, it’s too simplistic to view this as a regional downfall. The political liberal/neocon approach is unproductive, as RFK points out with increasing deficits. Since Hayek’s time, we’ve shifted towards an EUSSR, moving away from Adam Smith’s principles. Endless conflict is unproductive, but a shift could lead to stronger, more amicable relations in a multipolar world.
Finally a more nuanced, reasonable view of this question.
Is it just Western leftwingers that are sounding the alarm on the untrustworthyness of the rising populist right-wing?
I don't belong to that camp and say the same.
Have you heard Trump and others of his kinds promises? What are they other than complete demagogues?
I thus suspect that - hypothetically, if Trump were to become POTUS again, and other such ideological governments were to arise in Europe - when push comes to shove, Western economies will be much weaker than promised, and at the key moment Western opposition to anti-US/USD hegemony will be at least the same, if not stronger/bolder than today's.
Lastly, remember that also that while these people oppose assisting this Ukrainian regime, they support Israel in literally everything. So who could they represent other than the Anti-Christ?
Am I wrong? If so, why?
As a Dutch PhD currently in Russia with a deep appreciation for its culture, I question why the West is often categorised narrowly and why Russia is depicted mechanically in this article with soo many assumptions. Berdyaev noted that Westerners misunderstand Russia due to their short-sighted idealism, which seems reflected here. Despite differing strategic interests, such as those of Orban, why categorize nations as “the enemy” instead of evaluating each on its own terms? Some leadership positions may indeed become fragile, and while I also hope the LGBTQ+ movement ages like the Woodstock movement, it’s too simplistic to view this as a regional downfall. The political liberal/neocon approach is unproductive, as RFK points out with increasing deficits. Since Hayek’s time, we’ve shifted towards an EUSSR, moving away from Adam Smith’s principles. Endless conflict is unproductive, but a shift could lead to stronger, more amicable relations in a multipolar world.
Jewkraine is an Ashkenazi, not a Nazi regime.
yes, they are fine article
What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating w/ POTUS to eliminate the NWO?