It’s always good to read Dugin. My only problem with Hinkle is that he is young and doesn’t quite have all of the historical understanding.
Obviously, that can change, but often times his comments while emotional and exciting and ostensibly in the right direction, they lack certain kind of depth that you need to defeat these creeps
I'm a little more pedestrian here. "Communism" was coined by Lenin to discriminate Marxist fundamentalists from the variegated "socialists" of the era. It's salient features were abolishing property rights and the church which held them sacrosanct. The three estates remained throughout Marxi's life and no doubt the aristocracy's monopoly of property was a major cause of the French Revolution from whihc Marx derived his philosophy.
Neither Trump nor Carlson want to abolish property nor church.
What they do want to do is nothing less than revolutionary however and that is what Marxism, Socialism or communism has come to mean all over the world i.e. revolt against the Golden Billions who monoolize the world's wealth: %0.1 of the American population.
"Socialism" in Syria, Palestine, Cuba et al meant a popular government nationalizing industry and resources exploited by foreing "colonizers". Marx was major anti-imperialism. Government is th eonly institution capable of running these corprations since they lack a substantial middle class. This is what Frederick the Great did in 18th Century Prussia and probably why Marx thought is was a good idea because the "Camarilla" did work.
The "aristocrats" today however are just jaded, vacuous, stupid little people who inherited wealth and can't imagine life outside the local pool parties. The Mythology of WW2 tells htme that they are the "Chosen Ones" because America won the war. Everything they thinki therefore right because they thought it up. They think they are socialists becasue they want to tax the rich never mind they are the rich.
Trump is more one the Golden Billions than us. His polices are a littel different but over all, not that much. "MAGA" means WW2 "Great". Trump is more pragmatic but he'll disappoint again, I'm sure. We dodge a bullet, for sure. But the sand still runs out.
Carlson is entirely different but also a professional spectator. That' s how he maintain his persepctive i.e. by not having a stake in it. He's also no leader. Neither is Trump, really.
Our only hope is that Trump wants revenge and won't play by the rules anymore because Dugin was right when he said that 6 Jan should have been what Democrats said it was.
Hinkle's "Maga Communist" grift is very ideologically and theologically confused (he also claims to be a Christian, while simultaneously treating Lenin and Stalin as his heroes). He's best ignored and relegated to the BernieBrio swamp he crawled out of. His ubiquity is as inorganic and algo-generated as that of fellow grifter Lex Fridman.
Interesting comment by Dugin, as always. I'm closely following the developments of the "Magacommunists"
Thank you so much for publishing Dugin. This is a great service to all thinking informed people.
Interesting comment by Dugin, as always. I'm closely following the developments of the "Magacommunists"
MAGA communism is rising! 🦍🦍☀️☀️
https://substack.com/@derpderpderp/note/c-49513516?r=2kpk00
https://open.substack.com/pub/mayobear/p/russian-fascists-and-maga-communism?r=2gsf5f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
It’s always good to read Dugin. My only problem with Hinkle is that he is young and doesn’t quite have all of the historical understanding.
Obviously, that can change, but often times his comments while emotional and exciting and ostensibly in the right direction, they lack certain kind of depth that you need to defeat these creeps
I'm a little more pedestrian here. "Communism" was coined by Lenin to discriminate Marxist fundamentalists from the variegated "socialists" of the era. It's salient features were abolishing property rights and the church which held them sacrosanct. The three estates remained throughout Marxi's life and no doubt the aristocracy's monopoly of property was a major cause of the French Revolution from whihc Marx derived his philosophy.
Neither Trump nor Carlson want to abolish property nor church.
What they do want to do is nothing less than revolutionary however and that is what Marxism, Socialism or communism has come to mean all over the world i.e. revolt against the Golden Billions who monoolize the world's wealth: %0.1 of the American population.
"Socialism" in Syria, Palestine, Cuba et al meant a popular government nationalizing industry and resources exploited by foreing "colonizers". Marx was major anti-imperialism. Government is th eonly institution capable of running these corprations since they lack a substantial middle class. This is what Frederick the Great did in 18th Century Prussia and probably why Marx thought is was a good idea because the "Camarilla" did work.
The "aristocrats" today however are just jaded, vacuous, stupid little people who inherited wealth and can't imagine life outside the local pool parties. The Mythology of WW2 tells htme that they are the "Chosen Ones" because America won the war. Everything they thinki therefore right because they thought it up. They think they are socialists becasue they want to tax the rich never mind they are the rich.
Trump is more one the Golden Billions than us. His polices are a littel different but over all, not that much. "MAGA" means WW2 "Great". Trump is more pragmatic but he'll disappoint again, I'm sure. We dodge a bullet, for sure. But the sand still runs out.
Carlson is entirely different but also a professional spectator. That' s how he maintain his persepctive i.e. by not having a stake in it. He's also no leader. Neither is Trump, really.
Our only hope is that Trump wants revenge and won't play by the rules anymore because Dugin was right when he said that 6 Jan should have been what Democrats said it was.
Hinkle's "Maga Communist" grift is very ideologically and theologically confused (he also claims to be a Christian, while simultaneously treating Lenin and Stalin as his heroes). He's best ignored and relegated to the BernieBrio swamp he crawled out of. His ubiquity is as inorganic and algo-generated as that of fellow grifter Lex Fridman.
Did you use ChatGPT to write this?
Explain why it's a grift.