Agree. Trump have said he would stop the war in Ukraine in 24 hours Now after 2 1/2 month the war stills goes on. USA NATO EU have started the war in 2014. Despite Putin warnings they continue their expansion Russia only projects their territory and their citizens USA NATO EU have lost and it’s always the winner who decides the conditions for a peace plan. Never the losers But Trump will not accept this and think it’s USA who shall dictate the conditions The negotiations have proofed that Trump are a very bad negotiator He have no strategy and are controlled by feelings not facts and it’s obvious that he don’t know what to do. Putin have outplayed him and are a much better and more intelligent negotiator than Trump If Trump really want to stop the war it’s quite simple Admit USA have lost and stop all support both financially and militarily Negotiate an Agreement plan with Russia for corporation and lift all sanctions If EU don’t accept that let them continue their loser war to the last Ukraine EU are a dictatorship and a paper tiger. They have no army no weapons no personnel and no money They are lead by corrupt criminal non elected leaders who have zero experience about war and combat That will be the end of EU who will collapse and that’s good for Europe USA Russia China don’t really care about EU no one take them seriously
This text presents a strongly partisan and ideologically charged perspective on the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, as well as the role of the United States and European Union in it. Below, I will critique the argument using four methodological lenses: logic, philosophy, history, and sociology.
⸻
1. Logical Analysis
The text contains multiple logical fallacies, contradictions, and unfounded assumptions.
A. Inconsistencies and Contradictions
• The text first argues that Trump is angry at Zelensky for potentially backing out of a deal over rare earth minerals.
• It then claims that reports of Trump being angry at Putin are unreliable because they come from a “mainstream liberal” journalist.
• The conclusion drawn is that Trump is “confused” and does not understand the war.
However, these claims do not logically connect:
• Trump could be angry at both Putin and Zelensky for different reasons.
• The dismissal of the report on Trump’s anger at Putin because it comes from an NBC anchor is an ad hominem fallacy—the source alone does not make a claim false.
B. Unfounded Assumptions
• The text assumes that Trump’s “peace plan” could have succeeded but was undermined by external actors. However, no evidence is provided that such a plan was ever viable.
• It claims that Trump is “gradually pulling out” of the war, but no concrete policy statements or actions from Trump are cited.
• The idea that Trump’s “Make America Great Again” agenda necessarily includes a withdrawal from Ukraine is not substantiated. Trump has taken contradictory positions on the war, at times expressing support for military aid while also advocating for negotiation.
C. Fallacy of False Causality
• The text implies that Macron’s rival, Marine Le Pen, was convicted because of George Soros. This is a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy—just because two events happened in proximity does not mean one caused the other.
• It suggests that because the European Union is increasing its role in Ukraine, this will result in “liberal dictatorship” in Europe. This false cause fallacy lacks evidence and is based purely on ideological assumptions.
⸻
2. Philosophical Analysis
This text is rooted in a Manichean worldview—a division of the world into absolute good and evil.
A. Dichotomous Thinking
• The binary thinking (e.g., “sovereign regimes” = good, “liberal democracies” = corrupt and evil) ignores nuance.
• The portrayal of the EU as a “liberal dictatorship” suggests a misunderstanding of democracy—while democracies have issues, they are not inherently authoritarian.
B. Sovereignty vs. Globalism
• The argument assumes that sovereignty and international cooperation are mutually exclusive, which is not philosophically sound.
• Carl Schmitt’s concept of “the political” is relevant here—his argument that politics is defined by the friend-enemy distinction mirrors the author’s “us vs. them” rhetoric.
• However, Schmitt’s ideas are widely criticized for enabling authoritarianism. In reality, sovereign states engage in international agreements without losing autonomy.
C. Misuse of “Justice”
• The text argues that “justice only exists in sovereign regimes.” This is a category mistake—justice is a principle, not something that only exists in a specific type of government.
• By this logic, an authoritarian regime could arbitrarily declare its actions “just” without oversight.
⸻
3. Historical Analysis
The text rewrites history in multiple ways.
A. The Origins of the War
• The claim that the war was started by Trump’s ideological opponents in the U.S. ignores the clear historical record that Russia launched the invasion in February 2022.
• While NATO expansion may have been a factor in Russian strategic calculations, Putin’s own statements confirm that the invasion was a deliberate policy decision by Moscow.
B. The Istanbul Talks Parallel
• The argument that Britain and the EU forced Zelensky to abandon peace talks misrepresents the situation.
• The reality is that peace talks collapsed because of Russian demands that Ukraine remain demilitarized and recognize Russian territorial claims, which Ukraine rejected.
C. U.S. Policy in Ukraine
• The idea that Trump’s withdrawal signals American disengagement ignores U.S. historical patterns of proxy conflicts. Even if Trump personally wants to withdraw, there is no guarantee the U.S. military-industrial complex will allow a full disengagement.
⸻
4. Sociological Analysis
The text reflects a propaganda-driven narrative that aligns with Russian nationalist and anti-globalist ideology.
A. Narrative Construction
• The text frames Russia as an existential victim while portraying the West as a monolithic, corrupt force.
• The use of emotionally charged language (“blood-soaked clown,” “globalist networks”) is a hallmark of propaganda techniques designed to provoke strong reactions rather than encourage critical thinking.
B. The Role of Conspiracy Theories
• The text uses anti-globalist conspiracies (e.g., Soros controls all judges) as a way to delegitimize Western democratic institutions.
• This plays into a larger Russian disinformation strategy that portrays Western democracies as inherently corrupt to justify authoritarian alternatives.
C. Authoritarian Justification
• The conclusion that “justice only exists in sovereign regimes” implies that authoritarian rule is superior to democracy.
• This overlooks historical evidence that authoritarian regimes often engage in legal manipulation and political repression at far higher levels than democracies.
⸻
Conclusion: The Text is Ideologically Driven, Logically Inconsistent, and Historically Inaccurate
This text is not an objective analysis of geopolitics but rather a partisan argument designed to frame the war in a way that justifies Russian aggression while discrediting Western democratic institutions.
• Logically, it is riddled with contradictions and fallacies.
• Philosophically, it promotes binary thinking and an authoritarian view of justice.
• Historically, it distorts events to fit its narrative.
• Sociologically, it employs propaganda techniques and conspiracy theories.
Ultimately, this text does not present a reliable or critical perspective but instead serves as a rhetorical tool for ideological persuasion.
Go to Global Research - April 14, 2025 and read "Trump Backs Away from Improving Relations with Russia"
by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts -
and discard the nonsense that Dugin has long been babbling that denotes that he either lives in a parallel universe or suffers from dementia - if people in his country believe him, they are in the way to losing the conflict and their country in a suicidal unawareness of what is really happening.
Dugin’s multipolarity emerges from the lesson of the USSR: imposing a single ideology—like communism—on diverse cultures leads to collapse. The West, through the USA and EU, repeated the same mistake, believing democracy is the only valid system, echoing Fukuyama’s “end of history.” Dugin rejects this universalism. He proposes a world of sovereign civilizations, each following its own path—multipolarity as the antidote to ideological schismogenesis.
I globalisti neoliberali non vogliono cedere le armi, preferiscono mandare al massacro l'Europa piuttosto che fare un passo indietro. Putin lo sapeva fin dall'inizio, non si è mai illuso, bene perché così può andare dritto per la strada che aveva tracciato fin dall'inizio: denazificare l'Ucraina.
Make me president. It would end immediately. The United States has a responsibility to Europe ever since getting involved in the last two world wars, especially the latter world war. Germany was all set to take its natural position as the latest leading nation of western Christian civilization, and stop the threats of the outside world, but Jews, in control of the US, the UK, and the USSR, all nations united by Jewish plutocracy, dethroned Germany during its ascendance and pull the rug out from under the rest of the European nations while they were at it. Even England lost its empire as a result. This was based on promises made by the United States at that time that it would be forever the big brother watchdog of western Christian European civilization. Trump has no right to unilaterally decide that he has no desire to play that game anymore. Russia must step down and step back, and Zelensky must be taken out of office as he isn’t even a Ukrainian. The first thing I would do is tell Putin to get the fuck out of Ukraine or I’ll nuke his ass.
More rubbish from a Russian groyper. Zelensky is not in charge. Neither is Putin. And of course, Trump is part of the charade. The whole point of the war in Ukraine is to kill as many Ukrainian men as possible to remove it from the world stage as a sovereign entity, and to shut the mouths of Ukrainians, who wish to Remind the world of the Holomodor, the deliberate starvation of tens of millions of Russians and Ukrainians by the Bolshevik Jews, who took over the Russian empire.
The purpose of the conflict is to destroy Europe and Russia as happened in WWII which gave the empire 80 years of absolute supremacy and also to prevent the China-Russia-Europe bridge: the Silk Road - this time to plunder Rusia and contain the emerging power of China - win-win-win -
Much gratitude professor Dugin; heartfelt condolences on the loss of your daughter. May the scum responsible spend eternity in the bottomless pit where the worm never dies.
I’ve watched the Bolsheviks who have taken over Washington, London and Brussels continuously expand NATO after Bush 1 promised Russia a neutral buffer zone in exchange for removing 300,000 occupying troops from east Germany to allow peaceful reunification. The conquest of Russia and the Russian people is now and has always been their end goal. Happy day doobie
Globalist Elites = Rothschild Empire/ City of London (🇬🇧 & 🇮🇱).
Agree. Trump have said he would stop the war in Ukraine in 24 hours Now after 2 1/2 month the war stills goes on. USA NATO EU have started the war in 2014. Despite Putin warnings they continue their expansion Russia only projects their territory and their citizens USA NATO EU have lost and it’s always the winner who decides the conditions for a peace plan. Never the losers But Trump will not accept this and think it’s USA who shall dictate the conditions The negotiations have proofed that Trump are a very bad negotiator He have no strategy and are controlled by feelings not facts and it’s obvious that he don’t know what to do. Putin have outplayed him and are a much better and more intelligent negotiator than Trump If Trump really want to stop the war it’s quite simple Admit USA have lost and stop all support both financially and militarily Negotiate an Agreement plan with Russia for corporation and lift all sanctions If EU don’t accept that let them continue their loser war to the last Ukraine EU are a dictatorship and a paper tiger. They have no army no weapons no personnel and no money They are lead by corrupt criminal non elected leaders who have zero experience about war and combat That will be the end of EU who will collapse and that’s good for Europe USA Russia China don’t really care about EU no one take them seriously
You are as delusional as dugin
https://www.youtube.com/live/iJezuheYPqY?si=AcicFrx_9Bekm6wt
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs : Does Trump Understand Basic Economics?. ??
Critical Analysis of the Provided Text
This text presents a strongly partisan and ideologically charged perspective on the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, as well as the role of the United States and European Union in it. Below, I will critique the argument using four methodological lenses: logic, philosophy, history, and sociology.
⸻
1. Logical Analysis
The text contains multiple logical fallacies, contradictions, and unfounded assumptions.
A. Inconsistencies and Contradictions
• The text first argues that Trump is angry at Zelensky for potentially backing out of a deal over rare earth minerals.
• It then claims that reports of Trump being angry at Putin are unreliable because they come from a “mainstream liberal” journalist.
• The conclusion drawn is that Trump is “confused” and does not understand the war.
However, these claims do not logically connect:
• Trump could be angry at both Putin and Zelensky for different reasons.
• The dismissal of the report on Trump’s anger at Putin because it comes from an NBC anchor is an ad hominem fallacy—the source alone does not make a claim false.
B. Unfounded Assumptions
• The text assumes that Trump’s “peace plan” could have succeeded but was undermined by external actors. However, no evidence is provided that such a plan was ever viable.
• It claims that Trump is “gradually pulling out” of the war, but no concrete policy statements or actions from Trump are cited.
• The idea that Trump’s “Make America Great Again” agenda necessarily includes a withdrawal from Ukraine is not substantiated. Trump has taken contradictory positions on the war, at times expressing support for military aid while also advocating for negotiation.
C. Fallacy of False Causality
• The text implies that Macron’s rival, Marine Le Pen, was convicted because of George Soros. This is a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy—just because two events happened in proximity does not mean one caused the other.
• It suggests that because the European Union is increasing its role in Ukraine, this will result in “liberal dictatorship” in Europe. This false cause fallacy lacks evidence and is based purely on ideological assumptions.
⸻
2. Philosophical Analysis
This text is rooted in a Manichean worldview—a division of the world into absolute good and evil.
A. Dichotomous Thinking
• The binary thinking (e.g., “sovereign regimes” = good, “liberal democracies” = corrupt and evil) ignores nuance.
• The portrayal of the EU as a “liberal dictatorship” suggests a misunderstanding of democracy—while democracies have issues, they are not inherently authoritarian.
B. Sovereignty vs. Globalism
• The argument assumes that sovereignty and international cooperation are mutually exclusive, which is not philosophically sound.
• Carl Schmitt’s concept of “the political” is relevant here—his argument that politics is defined by the friend-enemy distinction mirrors the author’s “us vs. them” rhetoric.
• However, Schmitt’s ideas are widely criticized for enabling authoritarianism. In reality, sovereign states engage in international agreements without losing autonomy.
C. Misuse of “Justice”
• The text argues that “justice only exists in sovereign regimes.” This is a category mistake—justice is a principle, not something that only exists in a specific type of government.
• By this logic, an authoritarian regime could arbitrarily declare its actions “just” without oversight.
⸻
3. Historical Analysis
The text rewrites history in multiple ways.
A. The Origins of the War
• The claim that the war was started by Trump’s ideological opponents in the U.S. ignores the clear historical record that Russia launched the invasion in February 2022.
• While NATO expansion may have been a factor in Russian strategic calculations, Putin’s own statements confirm that the invasion was a deliberate policy decision by Moscow.
B. The Istanbul Talks Parallel
• The argument that Britain and the EU forced Zelensky to abandon peace talks misrepresents the situation.
• The reality is that peace talks collapsed because of Russian demands that Ukraine remain demilitarized and recognize Russian territorial claims, which Ukraine rejected.
C. U.S. Policy in Ukraine
• The idea that Trump’s withdrawal signals American disengagement ignores U.S. historical patterns of proxy conflicts. Even if Trump personally wants to withdraw, there is no guarantee the U.S. military-industrial complex will allow a full disengagement.
⸻
4. Sociological Analysis
The text reflects a propaganda-driven narrative that aligns with Russian nationalist and anti-globalist ideology.
A. Narrative Construction
• The text frames Russia as an existential victim while portraying the West as a monolithic, corrupt force.
• The use of emotionally charged language (“blood-soaked clown,” “globalist networks”) is a hallmark of propaganda techniques designed to provoke strong reactions rather than encourage critical thinking.
B. The Role of Conspiracy Theories
• The text uses anti-globalist conspiracies (e.g., Soros controls all judges) as a way to delegitimize Western democratic institutions.
• This plays into a larger Russian disinformation strategy that portrays Western democracies as inherently corrupt to justify authoritarian alternatives.
C. Authoritarian Justification
• The conclusion that “justice only exists in sovereign regimes” implies that authoritarian rule is superior to democracy.
• This overlooks historical evidence that authoritarian regimes often engage in legal manipulation and political repression at far higher levels than democracies.
⸻
Conclusion: The Text is Ideologically Driven, Logically Inconsistent, and Historically Inaccurate
This text is not an objective analysis of geopolitics but rather a partisan argument designed to frame the war in a way that justifies Russian aggression while discrediting Western democratic institutions.
• Logically, it is riddled with contradictions and fallacies.
• Philosophically, it promotes binary thinking and an authoritarian view of justice.
• Historically, it distorts events to fit its narrative.
• Sociologically, it employs propaganda techniques and conspiracy theories.
Ultimately, this text does not present a reliable or critical perspective but instead serves as a rhetorical tool for ideological persuasion.
Go to Global Research - April 14, 2025 and read "Trump Backs Away from Improving Relations with Russia"
by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts -
and discard the nonsense that Dugin has long been babbling that denotes that he either lives in a parallel universe or suffers from dementia - if people in his country believe him, they are in the way to losing the conflict and their country in a suicidal unawareness of what is really happening.
Dugin’s multipolarity emerges from the lesson of the USSR: imposing a single ideology—like communism—on diverse cultures leads to collapse. The West, through the USA and EU, repeated the same mistake, believing democracy is the only valid system, echoing Fukuyama’s “end of history.” Dugin rejects this universalism. He proposes a world of sovereign civilizations, each following its own path—multipolarity as the antidote to ideological schismogenesis.
You are as delusional as dugin
I globalisti neoliberali non vogliono cedere le armi, preferiscono mandare al massacro l'Europa piuttosto che fare un passo indietro. Putin lo sapeva fin dall'inizio, non si è mai illuso, bene perché così può andare dritto per la strada che aveva tracciato fin dall'inizio: denazificare l'Ucraina.
Make me president. It would end immediately. The United States has a responsibility to Europe ever since getting involved in the last two world wars, especially the latter world war. Germany was all set to take its natural position as the latest leading nation of western Christian civilization, and stop the threats of the outside world, but Jews, in control of the US, the UK, and the USSR, all nations united by Jewish plutocracy, dethroned Germany during its ascendance and pull the rug out from under the rest of the European nations while they were at it. Even England lost its empire as a result. This was based on promises made by the United States at that time that it would be forever the big brother watchdog of western Christian European civilization. Trump has no right to unilaterally decide that he has no desire to play that game anymore. Russia must step down and step back, and Zelensky must be taken out of office as he isn’t even a Ukrainian. The first thing I would do is tell Putin to get the fuck out of Ukraine or I’ll nuke his ass.
More rubbish from a Russian groyper. Zelensky is not in charge. Neither is Putin. And of course, Trump is part of the charade. The whole point of the war in Ukraine is to kill as many Ukrainian men as possible to remove it from the world stage as a sovereign entity, and to shut the mouths of Ukrainians, who wish to Remind the world of the Holomodor, the deliberate starvation of tens of millions of Russians and Ukrainians by the Bolshevik Jews, who took over the Russian empire.
The purpose of the conflict is to destroy Europe and Russia as happened in WWII which gave the empire 80 years of absolute supremacy and also to prevent the China-Russia-Europe bridge: the Silk Road - this time to plunder Rusia and contain the emerging power of China - win-win-win -
Much gratitude professor Dugin; heartfelt condolences on the loss of your daughter. May the scum responsible spend eternity in the bottomless pit where the worm never dies.
Apparently, you don’t know what’s really going on
I’ve watched the Bolsheviks who have taken over Washington, London and Brussels continuously expand NATO after Bush 1 promised Russia a neutral buffer zone in exchange for removing 300,000 occupying troops from east Germany to allow peaceful reunification. The conquest of Russia and the Russian people is now and has always been their end goal. Happy day doobie
💯
Wow! That is big news. Good to know. It's huge.
Yes, Mr. Trump talks too much without thinking through first.