27 Comments
User's avatar
Alex Santic's avatar

I generally agree with this analysis, or maybe more accurately I would like to believe in it. Many aspects of the new administration seem to reinforce it, but the situation is somewhat distorted by the fact that Trump has chosen to ally with Zionists, presumably to more effectively wield power. It's certainly helpful if major donors and Zionist advocacy institutions can help your friends and hurt your enemies. But in this respect we end up aligning with standard neocon doctrine. Bombing Houthis and potentially being drawn into a war with Iran has nothing to do with focusing on our regional sphere of influence. Israel's enemies are now our enemies.

Expand full comment
Alfredo 'Al' Nava's avatar

I partly agree.

If you and all other 'Zionism in USA politics' alarmists/ over-reactionaries prefer, I suggest that President Trump sever the traditional influence of Israel by informing Israel that the USA will not support nor defend Israel. Then Israel can protect itself and can attack any other country or area as they believe necessary.

Example: If Israel believes it should genocide Palestine, the USA will not interfere. If the UN sends its "peace-keeper" military, Israel can attack and kill them all, and send their nukes to offending countries.

The USA will not interfere because it won't support nor defend Zionism.

Problem solved?

Expand full comment
Alex Santic's avatar

Considering they use American weapons, economic support and diplomatic cover to accomplish things like that, it would probably help. You write as though USA is putting restraints on them. I think those are meager, perhaps just for show, or simply ineffectual.

Expand full comment
Alfredo 'Al' Nava's avatar

The only reason why Israel did/ does not completely own and govern Palestine and not destroy & conquer Lebanon, Egypt, and Jordan (& maybe Iraq), today/ now is because the USA restricts Israel, not the UN.

So yes, the USA restrains their aggression and territorial expanse.

Regarding current times and President Trump, I believe he has the best ideas to establish actual peace. He will force peace by maneuvering the decades-long precarious situation utilizing his charming alpha-sigma attitude and negotiation skills to convince stake-holders who want to join Trump or win against him by offering solutions.

Expand full comment
Alex Santic's avatar

Israel does what it wants and the USA supports it. Their interests are represented in the USA as a foreign agent with no registration or accountability. They have a propaganda hold on the country, a lobbying operation on politicians, and an interference operation for elections. They even do this with the money we give them. All that Trump has come up with in the way of solutions is (1) continue to enable them and perhaps even dial up provocations against their enemies, and (2) make proposals to assist in ethnic cleansing through real estate development. This is the Trump blind spot, but it's perhaps understandable because it's not clear that anyone can become President in the USA without full fledged support of Zionism.

Expand full comment
Ronda's avatar

It’s baffling how Trump wants to save lives yet lets Israel genocide Palestine.

I’ve stepped back from support and following him due to this.

Expand full comment
Alex Santic's avatar

Yes, I understand your point very well. Actually I expected this when I voted for him, even though my sympathies have always been with the Palestinians. But the establishment alternative was also an accomplice to genocide. There was no viable anti-Zionist in the race. Trump at least is anti-globalist and this is very important.

Expand full comment
Gerardine Hoogland's avatar

I am very interested in your thoughts of where Australia fits into this, particularly given we are in the geographical sphere of China but a western nation.

We are among the oldest democracies in the world but being “down under” and small, we play such an insignificant role in global affairs. Yet, we sit as perhaps the richest of all continents that possess resource rich minerals.

Expand full comment
David O'Halloran's avatar

Interesting question. I think Dr Dugin underestimates, perhaps, the continuing power of London in world affairs. The UK, Canada, NZ and Australia, together with Dubai, Singapore and others, still represent an informal, London centric, axis of world power to be reckoned with. Obviously China will want Australian resources, but these will be defended if it ever came to a fight. Australia, sad to say, has always been an outlying, prison colony, a land of experiments and outcasts. Just look at how hard your puppet governors did London's bidding during covid - no doubt a test to see how far the UK public could be pushed. It often seems to me that the distinction between English, American, Canadian, Australian and NZ, is false; we are the same people with the same names, culture, history and religion; and we should all be, I think, part of one nation - free to move between the five as we choose. The Korean people are divided into two. We are divided into five.

Expand full comment
Ronda's avatar

I’ve heard that President Trump is going to include Australia and New Zealand in America.

As we are all Caucasian people deriving from the Aryans and Atlantis.

Expand full comment
David O'Halloran's avatar

Exactly - we are the same people, of the same race, with the same history culture, religion, art, education, philosophy, political systems, and language, - so why do we have to pretend we are from different countries ? Does that suit us somehow? We should be one. The only thing that being from so called different countries does is lessen our freedom and increase the power of our prison guards.

Expand full comment
Gerardine Hoogland's avatar

I love your thinking, David, on the connection between the five nations. We share a rich history of genealogy and political inheritance.

Not sure about how much defending will be done over our grab for resources. Our political class are weak and insipid and are doing everything they can to change our cultural landscape.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

I'm not sure how the AUKUS project is going, but you will be pulled into the war with China. I'd keep quiet about the resources too, Trump has no compunction in stealing them from autonemous nations https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjXzhd4GVzE

Expand full comment
Mason, Storyteller's avatar

I'm very interested in hearing your thoughts about where and how Israel fits in especially with relation to MAGA. I'm still sickened by the unknown number of starving and dead children. There has to be a better way than "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." This much is clear. I will always be antiwar.

Expand full comment
Ronda's avatar

I too I’m sickened by this. No one has held Israel accountable.

Expand full comment
Mason, Storyteller's avatar

Because I feel afraid to voice my beliefs and suffer retribution and being labeled. Since when is war justified?

Expand full comment
Pierre-Louis Ours's avatar

Thank you.

Please consider reading “The Rock Breaks the Globalists’ Empire “ for a possible end-game.

Expand full comment
Franz Kafka's avatar

Power stems from the barrel of a gun.

Sovereignty is something else.

Expand full comment
José S Mendez's avatar

Americans with or without Trump don't change. It's objectives are the same only less colourful. Is expected a war against Iran and after against china so gringos need calm down in Ukraine for now with false promises they will be back with their's european proxies.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

How do you explain then the repeated words, by Trump, Rubio, Vance and Hegseth that China represents an economic, military and political threat to US primacy that must be dealt with by aggressive war? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjXzhd4GVzE

Expand full comment
Cy Rider's avatar

From the heavenly images on the cover and a flattering article that seems more the product of dazzlement than good judgment, it is prudent to wait at least a couple of years, because early predictions tend to fail.

Expand full comment
Sako Vkt's avatar

IOW-Cold War "spheres of influence",,,how enlightening!~

Expand full comment
Alfredo 'Al' Nava's avatar

As a Native-American, Trumplican, Marxist, and Nietzschean, I agree with Dugin's assessment and opinion.

President Trump literally is battling and defeating the USA Democrats' and globalists' Orwellian neo-fascist Stalinism.

Expand full comment
GreatNorthMedia's avatar

Alexander goes Bla Bla Bla Bla Bla... Donny is a Thechnocrat same has the stakeholder Unipolar Globalist that run the Political Circus in Exceptional JewMeriKa. and the Banana Republic of Canada. Get with the F-ing Program.

Expand full comment
Alfredo 'Al' Nava's avatar

As a Marxist, I agree with Alexander's political opinion.

Also, I support President Trump's national, inter-national, geo-political, and federal policies because they all support the Working-class of USA citizens (first), then can benefit the citizens of other Trump/ MAGA-esque nations.

Expand full comment
GreatNorthMedia's avatar

I'm fascinated by the average Marxizt dumb as a f-Ing doorknob understanding of Politics, national, international, geo-political, and federal policies. Donny isn't hard at work saving Jobs for the working Class son. you just keep on spewing The MAGA Propaganda and let the adults talk politics you are way out of you're League Son, Oh and by the way, Marx was a twat, just like Donny.

Expand full comment
Alba Voce's avatar

Blah blah blah, you regurgitate Francis Parker Yockey but from your gay Soviet perspective.

Expand full comment