Very fair and well said. For me, people distinguishing between the west or our deep state government and the actual people is important. The US has served the American people as little as the EU has served European interests. Both seem to be too easily directed to by the UN and to me all world governing organizations are inherently globalist.
The global south for the most part is opportunistic. India haggling with Trump is more a sign of this than anything else. Meanwhile they made more plans to immigrate to Australia. Multipolarity is already here in the sense of multiple world powers, yet globalism still exists.
I also do not see how an extremely expanded and dependent global south can ever truly be a pole. Better to leave them to a minimal balance with nature, destroy the world bank and IMF, replace the gdp with a global north economy etc. the same racial egalitarianism of liberal globalism should not be applied to the global south. Colonialism should never have given them our technique.
To be honest this has to be said, and I know this is something specific to Von Hoffmeister but there are so many chuds who are like “ WOW MULTIPOLARITY KEWL!!!” To be honest multipolarity is a status quo that should remain, but it is a default. I think Arktos is right in that we need to focus on the north-western hyperborean world, rather than focusing on the entire planet. Multipolarity is a competition, and Arktos is spearheading a better tomorrow for the hyberborean pole (as it should)
Hello Arktos, I am looking for a distributor of your books in Canada as ordering them from the site is prohibitively expensive, with shipping costs being more than the books themselves. Please let me know if there is a vendor on the west coast of Canada. Thank you!
Very fair and well said. For me, people distinguishing between the west or our deep state government and the actual people is important. The US has served the American people as little as the EU has served European interests. Both seem to be too easily directed to by the UN and to me all world governing organizations are inherently globalist.
The global south for the most part is opportunistic. India haggling with Trump is more a sign of this than anything else. Meanwhile they made more plans to immigrate to Australia. Multipolarity is already here in the sense of multiple world powers, yet globalism still exists.
I also do not see how an extremely expanded and dependent global south can ever truly be a pole. Better to leave them to a minimal balance with nature, destroy the world bank and IMF, replace the gdp with a global north economy etc. the same racial egalitarianism of liberal globalism should not be applied to the global south. Colonialism should never have given them our technique.
Are you a euro-Siberia advocate (as Guillaume Faye was)?
Hmmm similar. I would like to see something of an extension of that to the entire global north. I wrote about it here:
https://arktos.com/2025/06/24/the-rising-north-and-stratocratic-revival/
Very cool, I believe Guillaume Faye was an advocate of that
Nice! I’ve read some of his articles and like them. My stances seem most similar to his of anyone I’ve found in more modern times.
To be honest this has to be said, and I know this is something specific to Von Hoffmeister but there are so many chuds who are like “ WOW MULTIPOLARITY KEWL!!!” To be honest multipolarity is a status quo that should remain, but it is a default. I think Arktos is right in that we need to focus on the north-western hyperborean world, rather than focusing on the entire planet. Multipolarity is a competition, and Arktos is spearheading a better tomorrow for the hyberborean pole (as it should)
Hello Arktos, I am looking for a distributor of your books in Canada as ordering them from the site is prohibitively expensive, with shipping costs being more than the books themselves. Please let me know if there is a vendor on the west coast of Canada. Thank you!