Discussion about this post

User's avatar
sakovkt's avatar

All scientific theories exclude “reality” except for the phenomena in question. We have to do that to see all the pieces working but, as with , chemists understgdn the limitations. When something goes wrong on the floor, is it a pH problem? Overlaoded? Known contaminants? Redeposit? It’s expensive to junk a 1,500 gallon vat but sometimes, that’s the best you can do.

Expand full comment
sakovkt's avatar

We think of creativity in terms of the masters.

How many rock bands have we never heard of? How many one hit wonders? The Beatles or Led Zeppelin were likely no more talented than some but hit a popular vein and mined it. Couldn’t AI music do the same?

Many are called, but few are chosen?

Artificial intelligence has created the first new antibiotic in years. Drug discovery is tedious but AI coupled with computer quantum chemistry can rip through candidates quick.

This is really no more than the literature search by which in Fritz Haber’s WW1 “bureau” came up with new war gasses, calling out: ease of manufacture: heavier than air: toxic at low concentrations : thermal stability.

Adding a computer that can predict quantum properties of novel molecules is just the next step (in fact, nitrogen mustards were war gasses that became chemo-therapy agents)

You can download Argus Lab, a free, computer chemistry program and, I wouldn’t doubt, hook it up to a DIY primitive AI to search for some molecular properties you want.

Art?

The first to complain were porn stars. AI created models more erotic than the real thing. Ha! Well, what’s real about pornography to begin with? However, if it’s more erotic than anyone real, then it isn’t real. It’s fantasy. Any lack of that, already? If it does look real, and some does, then what’s new about it? You can find people who look just like that but, you don’t have to pay to photograph them. Bum-mer, if that’s your schtick, and a really over paid one, at that. Sorry! No sympathy.

In fact, isn’t this something that painters have been doing forever? Creative visuals? Realism? Romantic? Goth? Cubism? Impression?

Music? Classic? Baroque? Classic? Romantic?

Some works, most doesn’t? But, AI can do it faster.

Maybe, this means, that humanity isn’t defined by intellect or creativity anymore than strength or even sex.

Am I less human as I age, my intellect fades, and my response to most things is that I’ve heard it before? Some sexy girl smiling seductively at me on tube of silicone caulk that is supposed to, ,,to,,make me do what? Buy the thing? Well, that’s what I went to the hardware store for. The roof leaks.

Is there any way out of here? AI can navigate,,,,

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts