Yes! The power of terminology to manipulate thinking is terrifying. The Old Testament of the Christian Bible isn't about the religion of "Judaism" - it's about the Promise of the Coming Christ & the history of the Israelites.
"Judaism" is an apostate religion which arose long after Abraham's Time. Jesus constantly railed against that false religion - so much so that some Jews demand that publishers of Bibles be forced to put "anti-Semitism" disclosures in the Bibles they publish. Judaism & Christianity are opposites and enemies of each other!
Yet the term, "Judeo-Christian", falsely manipulates People into believing that Christianity arose out of Judaism and that the two are related & compatible.
But that accursed term, "Judeo-Christian", has been in use much longer than 20 years. I heard it used during the early 1950s, and it infected MY thinking until I actually read the Bible with an open mind. Then I saw that the two religions are in enmity with each other.
They don't teach Logic in American public schools and Americans are unable to think. In the public schools, we were programmed to uncritically accept whatever our teachers told us and to repeat it on tests. The term, "Jew", is ambiguous: It can mean a descendant of Judah (as Jesus was); it can mean a resident of the Province of Judea; or it can mean an adherent of the apostate religion known as "Judaism". Zionists get these different meanings all mixed up - they trumpet, "JESUS WAS A JEW!" They just don't know - Martin Luther was right when he warned that public schools could open up the Gates of Hell to a Country. Hell is what one sees in America of today.
At every possible opportunity, we must object to the lying term, "Judeo-Christian" and explain why it's a lie.
Our Congress is controlled by "Israel", and Trump and many of those on his Cabinet are totally controlled by "Israel". They have been well paid for their support - look at the charts showing the amount of money various American politicians have received from AIPAC ! And they can feel good about themselves when they take the bribes because "Jesus was a Jew" and "Jews" are God's "chosen people". And God will bless them if they bless the modern day apostate nation state which falsely claims to be the "Israel" of the Old Testament.
Damn "hiring preachers" such as John Hagee & Paula White who teach false theology and get rich doing so.
Yet the term, "Judeo-Christian", falsely manipulates People into believing that Christianity arose out of Judaism and that the two are related & compatible
Why did Rabbi Yeshua preach in synagogues if he was not Jewish?
This is where the institution of the Church in the West has distorted our sense of European identity & of “the West” itself.
We’ve inherited Roman & Germanic law, Germanic social structure, most of our technological achievements come from Rome & the Anglosphere, our philosophy, our art, our spirituality—even including the Christian religion—the Greeks, Romans, Celts, and so on. To equate Judaism with authentic Christianity proves either one’s retardation or an argument of bad faith.
I’m not anti-Christian by any means, but when I see people say “Europe is Christianity & Greco-Roman” it really reduces the full picture in an overly simplistic way. It ignores the cultural human capital which was provided by the Germanic & Celtic peoples of Europe—which btw was never something emphasized in educational institutions.
I used to be one of those “European civilization is entirely Latin/Greek & Christian” people, but I now see that is an oversimplification. And of course this is something often exploited by the language-distorting tribal group who excel at mischaracterizing their enemies for their own gain.
If Alain de Benoist and other friends of the European Antiquity are consistent they would cultivate alliances of Europe with parts of the world that escaped the "judeo-christian", and "abrahamist" waves that swept over our subcontinent and threaten to continue doing so : India, China and the Far East. That is precisely that sort of alliance that the Jewish lobby and the Anglosphere are desperate to keep from happening. To prevent such an outcome they would be ready to trigger the apocalypse . Europe must ally with India and East Asia as Leibniz advocated already in the 17th century.
derp. christian judaism is a sect of judaism. you follow judaic rabbi, worship their mythology, and the first book in “your” bible is literally the torah.
The true division, not this false one between so called Paganism and Christianity but which "Paganism" (literally villagism in Latin) and which Christianity.
True roots of Christianity are Orphic, Hellenic-Roman, not Judeo-Semitic, Plato and Neoplatonism not the Abrahamic Old Testament.
The hall judeo think is the usurpation, the absolute Cultural Appropriation, at the same fashion they userp for example Cleopatra claiming her to be Subsaharian.
Zeus Christ was a Hellenic speaking Palestinian and nothing else. A short of historification of Dionysus. And by the way Hellenism as a Religion is a pluralistic Enotheiam and not Polytheism.
If we place Plato and the Neoplatonists at the place of the so called Old Testament then we have the Platonic Religions.
Hellenism instead of so called Paganism, Platonic or Hellenic Christianity (more close to what is now Orthodoxy but without the Old Testament nonsense) and Platonic Islam (more close to The Shia and Sufism than the Salafist and the Wahabist judeo-Muslims).
That's the true division and not this false one between so called Paganism and Christianity but which "Paganism" and which Christianity. It is time we realize this. Our Hellenic-Roman Heritage and true deep essential, primordial so to say, Christianity - definitely not Protestantism - are one and the same.
The only thing we need to do is to unveil Hellenism under Christianity but not against Christianity. Both of them will shine stronger in the light of one another just like Apollo and Dionysus in the Nietzschean Birth of Tragedy.
Here is a concise review-style critique in English:
---
In *The Papal Curse*, Laurent Guyénot presents a provocative thesis: that key reforms of the medieval papacy fundamentally reshaped European society in ways that fostered long-term patterns of violence, instability, and expansionism. By linking ecclesiastical policies—particularly those affecting family structures—to what he calls a “European syndrome,” the author offers a bold reinterpretation of Western history.
While the argument is intellectually stimulating, it raises significant concerns. First, the book tends to reduce complex historical developments to a single overarching cause, overlooking the interplay of economic, political, and cultural forces that also shaped Europe. Second, the notion of a unified “European syndrome” risks oversimplifying the continent’s diversity, treating vastly different societies as if they followed a single trajectory.
Moreover, Guyénot’s portrayal of the medieval Church is often one-sided, emphasizing its disruptive influence while giving limited attention to its role in preserving knowledge, fostering education, and stabilizing institutions. His causal links between papal reforms and long-term social consequences are also debated, as they rely on interpretations that many historians consider insufficiently supported by evidence.
In sum, *The Papal Curse* is a thought-provoking but controversial work. It succeeds in challenging conventional narratives but falls short of offering a fully balanced or widely accepted account of Europe’s historical development.
Yes! The power of terminology to manipulate thinking is terrifying. The Old Testament of the Christian Bible isn't about the religion of "Judaism" - it's about the Promise of the Coming Christ & the history of the Israelites.
"Judaism" is an apostate religion which arose long after Abraham's Time. Jesus constantly railed against that false religion - so much so that some Jews demand that publishers of Bibles be forced to put "anti-Semitism" disclosures in the Bibles they publish. Judaism & Christianity are opposites and enemies of each other!
Yet the term, "Judeo-Christian", falsely manipulates People into believing that Christianity arose out of Judaism and that the two are related & compatible.
But that accursed term, "Judeo-Christian", has been in use much longer than 20 years. I heard it used during the early 1950s, and it infected MY thinking until I actually read the Bible with an open mind. Then I saw that the two religions are in enmity with each other.
They don't teach Logic in American public schools and Americans are unable to think. In the public schools, we were programmed to uncritically accept whatever our teachers told us and to repeat it on tests. The term, "Jew", is ambiguous: It can mean a descendant of Judah (as Jesus was); it can mean a resident of the Province of Judea; or it can mean an adherent of the apostate religion known as "Judaism". Zionists get these different meanings all mixed up - they trumpet, "JESUS WAS A JEW!" They just don't know - Martin Luther was right when he warned that public schools could open up the Gates of Hell to a Country. Hell is what one sees in America of today.
At every possible opportunity, we must object to the lying term, "Judeo-Christian" and explain why it's a lie.
Our Congress is controlled by "Israel", and Trump and many of those on his Cabinet are totally controlled by "Israel". They have been well paid for their support - look at the charts showing the amount of money various American politicians have received from AIPAC ! And they can feel good about themselves when they take the bribes because "Jesus was a Jew" and "Jews" are God's "chosen people". And God will bless them if they bless the modern day apostate nation state which falsely claims to be the "Israel" of the Old Testament.
Damn "hiring preachers" such as John Hagee & Paula White who teach false theology and get rich doing so.
Thank you for your Article.
Yet the term, "Judeo-Christian", falsely manipulates People into believing that Christianity arose out of Judaism and that the two are related & compatible
Why did Rabbi Yeshua preach in synagogues if he was not Jewish?
https://biblehub.com/luke/4-16.htm
Judeo-Christian is an American term to foster a political coalition between certain Jews and Christians.
It is merely the long shadow of America’s influence that the term gets picked up by leaders across the world.
One could imagine a parallel world with a different demography where the term Indo-European holds similar salience.
This is where the institution of the Church in the West has distorted our sense of European identity & of “the West” itself.
We’ve inherited Roman & Germanic law, Germanic social structure, most of our technological achievements come from Rome & the Anglosphere, our philosophy, our art, our spirituality—even including the Christian religion—the Greeks, Romans, Celts, and so on. To equate Judaism with authentic Christianity proves either one’s retardation or an argument of bad faith.
I’m not anti-Christian by any means, but when I see people say “Europe is Christianity & Greco-Roman” it really reduces the full picture in an overly simplistic way. It ignores the cultural human capital which was provided by the Germanic & Celtic peoples of Europe—which btw was never something emphasized in educational institutions.
I used to be one of those “European civilization is entirely Latin/Greek & Christian” people, but I now see that is an oversimplification. And of course this is something often exploited by the language-distorting tribal group who excel at mischaracterizing their enemies for their own gain.
If Alain de Benoist and other friends of the European Antiquity are consistent they would cultivate alliances of Europe with parts of the world that escaped the "judeo-christian", and "abrahamist" waves that swept over our subcontinent and threaten to continue doing so : India, China and the Far East. That is precisely that sort of alliance that the Jewish lobby and the Anglosphere are desperate to keep from happening. To prevent such an outcome they would be ready to trigger the apocalypse . Europe must ally with India and East Asia as Leibniz advocated already in the 17th century.
derp. christian judaism is a sect of judaism. you follow judaic rabbi, worship their mythology, and the first book in “your” bible is literally the torah.
The Hellenic Christian Tragedy
The true division, not this false one between so called Paganism and Christianity but which "Paganism" (literally villagism in Latin) and which Christianity.
True roots of Christianity are Orphic, Hellenic-Roman, not Judeo-Semitic, Plato and Neoplatonism not the Abrahamic Old Testament.
The hall judeo think is the usurpation, the absolute Cultural Appropriation, at the same fashion they userp for example Cleopatra claiming her to be Subsaharian.
Zeus Christ was a Hellenic speaking Palestinian and nothing else. A short of historification of Dionysus. And by the way Hellenism as a Religion is a pluralistic Enotheiam and not Polytheism.
If we place Plato and the Neoplatonists at the place of the so called Old Testament then we have the Platonic Religions.
Hellenism instead of so called Paganism, Platonic or Hellenic Christianity (more close to what is now Orthodoxy but without the Old Testament nonsense) and Platonic Islam (more close to The Shia and Sufism than the Salafist and the Wahabist judeo-Muslims).
That's the true division and not this false one between so called Paganism and Christianity but which "Paganism" and which Christianity. It is time we realize this. Our Hellenic-Roman Heritage and true deep essential, primordial so to say, Christianity - definitely not Protestantism - are one and the same.
The only thing we need to do is to unveil Hellenism under Christianity but not against Christianity. Both of them will shine stronger in the light of one another just like Apollo and Dionysus in the Nietzschean Birth of Tragedy.
Here is a concise review-style critique in English:
---
In *The Papal Curse*, Laurent Guyénot presents a provocative thesis: that key reforms of the medieval papacy fundamentally reshaped European society in ways that fostered long-term patterns of violence, instability, and expansionism. By linking ecclesiastical policies—particularly those affecting family structures—to what he calls a “European syndrome,” the author offers a bold reinterpretation of Western history.
While the argument is intellectually stimulating, it raises significant concerns. First, the book tends to reduce complex historical developments to a single overarching cause, overlooking the interplay of economic, political, and cultural forces that also shaped Europe. Second, the notion of a unified “European syndrome” risks oversimplifying the continent’s diversity, treating vastly different societies as if they followed a single trajectory.
Moreover, Guyénot’s portrayal of the medieval Church is often one-sided, emphasizing its disruptive influence while giving limited attention to its role in preserving knowledge, fostering education, and stabilizing institutions. His causal links between papal reforms and long-term social consequences are also debated, as they rely on interpretations that many historians consider insufficiently supported by evidence.
In sum, *The Papal Curse* is a thought-provoking but controversial work. It succeeds in challenging conventional narratives but falls short of offering a fully balanced or widely accepted account of Europe’s historical development.
ANti-semitic cope