Sunset of the Boomers, Dawn of the Zoomers
The postwar moral order is in its twilight years. With this foundational ideology supplanted, we can set about undoing the immense harm it has wreaked upon our civilisation.
I’ll start with the obvious but necessary disclaimer that these distinctions between generations are only used to indicate general patterns. Nobody realistically claims all Boomers are out of touch, smug, civic-nationalism-endorsing cucks, or that Zoomers are all based race realists; this is obviously untrue.
And yet there are unmistakable generational trends. The most clear-headed approach is neither to lionize nor demonize any generation, but rather to understand each as the inevitable product of its era and environment. Broadly speaking, actions result in reactions, resulting in what we understand as the tides of history.
Few would deny that certain peoples are extremely overrepresented in having pushed feminism and multiculturalism via mass Third World immigration into the West — however, it is important to understand that both trends were to some extent inevitable.
As technology continuously made life easier for housewives and mothers by automating manual tasks such as laundry and washing dishes, more time became available to those women. A few decades later, the dawn of the digital age created millions of new positions — gender-agnostic roles which could be performed just as easily by either sex. Unlike much of the work which dominated the industrial era, these new computer-based jobs had no requirement for inherently male traits like additional physical strength.
Therefore, whilst the actual ideology of feminism would not have been nearly as prevalent without Jewish activism, it seems certain that greater female participation in the labour market and then civic life was an inevitable consequence of modernity.
Similarly, while mass immigration and multiculturalism are unarguably linked to many decades of highly focused Jewish activism, there is also the obvious enabler of mass travel, particularly aviation over the last half-century. This accelerated in the 1980s with greater affordability and significant route expansion. Alongside this new possibility of efficiently transporting many people over long distances, it was inevitable that sooner or later some societies — particularly those dominated by capitalism — would exploit this technology by using mass movement to source cheap labour at scale, or simply to experiment with multiculturalism. The age of information then further catalysed Third World migration to the West, with many millions aware of and seeking to benefit from the prosperity of White nations.
The above is only to illustrate that multiple causes form chains of effect, and certainly not to deny the overwhelming influence of many decades of intensive, targeted subversion. This has been and still remains one of our biggest problems and challenges to overcome.
Furthermore, it should be noted that the enabling effect of technology works both ways. No matter how much our enemies insist otherwise, much of this undesirable change can very much be reversed. Just as mass air transit brought the majority of the unwanted immigrants in, the same mass transit will be used to return them back to where they came from.
It’s often said the boomers had it best; following the devastation of WWII, they grew up in an era of fresh prosperity, with plentiful access to jobs and housing. Crucially, they also got to enjoy most of their lives in White supermajority societies — which by extension means high-trust, safe and comfortable societies. Thus, they neither had to compete for the resources necessary for stability and family formation, nor did they suffer the daily misery inherent to multiculturalism itself; the crime, the disorder, the dirtiness, the ugliness.
Of course, it wasn’t mere material circumstance which shaped this generation morally and spiritually. It was the ideological framework we have come to understand as the post-WWII consensus. Whether consciously or subconsciously, this set of values permeated the mindset of this generation - a framework that upheld Hitler, National Socialism and Fascism as the greatest evils, Churchill as a hero, and the values of universal equality, cultural relativism, and liberalism as the ultimate good towards which society must always strive. As part of this framework, the Holocaust was firmly imprinted as history’s greatest crime against humanity.
By extension, Jews were able to present themselves as the ultimate victims, using the Holocaust in particular to browbeat Europeans and especially Germans to adopt a mindset of permanent, crippling guilt, forever trying yet never succeeding in atoning for the sins of their ancestors. This moral and psychological framework, firmly established in the wake of WWII, subsequently permeated every area of life in the West including governance, politics, law, education, and the media.
This is how we ended up where are today, with our nations, culture and people gravely imperiled. It’s fair to say we would not be in this position without (1) the post-WWII consensus and (2) the wholesale embracing of this consensus by the Boomer generation.
Without understanding the monumental influence of this, much about the modern West would simply not make sense — for example, the fact a small nation in the Middle East clearly dictates much of Western and particularly US policy, appears to outright own a vast proportion of our politicians, and has those politicians and figureheads constantly declaring loyalty and fealty to them. It becomes even more bewildering when seeing just how detrimental such policy is to the native European populations subjected to it.
Money talks — of course, many of the traitors governing us have simply been bought off. But would they have been bought off so easily were it not for the prevailing moral framework of their lifetimes? As individuals they likely have barely any morals or values at all, but when those well-worn moral claims can be used to publicly justify the treachery, it makes things far easier. Neither do they fear retribution for this treachery in future, so entrenched is the power structure they serve.
The next cohort, Generation X, occupied a curious position. Often typified as the ‘cynical’ generation, it’s not hard to understand why. Unlike our predecessors, so sure of their moral righteousness and infallibility of their values, we saw the true consequences unfold as we came of age. We witnessed the homogenous societies of our childhoods change, at first gradually, then rapidly. Old enough to remember how things were, but unlike the Boomers, too young to have enjoyed most of our lives this way, over half a lifetime we experienced the multiculturalisation of our nations. We may not have shared all the Boomers’ values, but we saw them use those values to mould and define the direction of our societies. In other words, we understand how it happened.
Fast forward to Generation Z, who grew up with the results of this direction of travel. A society where White children are routinely taught they are ‘privileged’ in schools and universities. Where young Whites are openly discriminated against by employers in their own homelands in favour of those with zero ancestral connection to them. They are finding themselves rapidly outnumbered by racial aliens within their own age cohorts.
As stressed by Zander here and highlighted by Arktos Journal’s publication of the text edition of The Right Wing Coalition’s video essay, “Gen Z: From Liberal to Far-Right”, the political trajectory and impact of Gen Z has been at the forefront of discussions on the present moment and near future.
We are pleased to announce that The Right Wing Coalition’s first book, American History Z, is forthcoming from Arktos this Spring.
Unlike previous generations, many Zoomers have no memory of a society in which crimes such as gang rape were virtually unheard of, and the constant threat of harm at the hands of non-whites was rare. Unlike previous generations, Zoomers have been engulfed by fully institutionalised anti-white hatred their entire lives. They may understand how things came to be this way - after all, they grew up with the Internet - but relating to it is another matter. Whatever the supposed sins of their fathers, they are long in the past, and that past itself is being called into question. In short, they’re not buying it.
One recent high-profile manifestation of this disconnect occurred during an interview of the American nationalist Zoomer Nick Fuentes by British Boomer media pundit Piers Morgan. Responding to Fuentes having called Hitler ‘cool’, Morgan played a video clip of Daniel Finkelstein, a Jewish Boomer, political commentator and House of Lords Peer. In this pre-recorded clip, Finkelstein berated Fuentes for his words, listing the supposed atrocities wrought upon his family by both Hitler and Stalin.
Fuentes was entirely unmoved, replying “my generation is done with the pearl-clutching”. Piers’ argument — that Fuentes’ young age and generational distance from the era was no excuse — fell flat.
One of the most notable things about the exchange is the fact that Morgan felt this clip of an aged, scolding Jew, a descendant of supposed Holocaust survivors, would cow Fuentes into submission. He deployed what he thought was his all-powerful hidden weapon — only to then seem genuinely nonplussed at Fuentes’ refusal to recant. The rejection of what Morgan considers an ironclad moral framework appeared to short-circuit his brain, and this is key to understanding that generational mindset. Not only did they swallow the post-WWII consensus wholesale, but they literally cannot think outside of its boundaries — so deep is the programming.
It didn’t end there. Material from and relating to this segment went viral, and not in the way Fuentes’ opponents intended. Comments on YouTube and X revealed broad support for Fuentes and scorn at the attempts to shame him into submission by invoking the Holocaust. Casually riffing on the exchange afterwards, Fuentes poked fun at English speech mannerisms, suggesting we use shorthand slang such as ‘The Holly’ to mean the Holocaust. This turbocharged what was already fast becoming a meme into a viral Christmas hit.
The Morgan/Finkelstein vs. Fuentes encounter is symbolic, heralding a clear demarcation not only between two generations, but two ideologies. Gen Z right wingers are more radical than any of their predecessors and no matter how much Jews tell them they must hate themselves, they won’t comply. They aren’t just rejecting the postwar mythos and perpetual weaponization of Jewish victimhood; they are mocking it without mercy.
Conversely, no generation has shown more sympathy for Jews and Israel than the Boomers. Conservatism itself has been destroyed by relentless fealty to Israel and its interests, not to mention other self-defeating, idiotic ideologies like civic nationalism. It is no longer considered a viable solution to the dire problems we face.
This era is drawing to a close. Whilst Jews still hold a vastly disproportionate degree of power across the Western world, and Israel has surpassed itself lately with warmongering belligerence and literal genocide of its neighbours, they are losing badly in the court of global public opinion. Israel is despised both by the left for its actions in Palestine, and by the right for their malevolent influence over our nations and involvement in virtually everything detrimental to our people. Their hold over the narrative is crumbling. They may have controlled Western mainstream media for decades, but they never fully controlled the Internet, despite their best efforts. The toothpaste cannot be put back in the tube.
The truth is that it’s only in the Boomer generation that Israel still finds any genuine support. Even the traitor politicians who answer to them only act for financial incentive, or as a result of blackmail, threats, or coercion. This power is built on an extremely fragile foundation, and cracks are already appearing in the edifice.
Once the Boomer generation has passed on, the Holocaust will no longer be viably deployed as a psychological tool to advance interests that harm our own. The foundational myth which has defined the post-war order is on life support. To many, the prospect of an end to the nightmare rapidly subsuming our civilisation seems too good to be true. The hegemony of the post-WWII paradigm and its Jewish beneficiaries might seem too great, too unshakeable, the traitors among us too numerous, the virus too embedded. But remember that the collapse of the Soviet Union came as a surprise to many when it finally occurred. While the stagnation and dysfunction of the entire system was no secret, slow decline and fragmentation seemed more likely than the sudden end heralded by the felling of the Berlin Wall.
The passing of this poisonous moral order is akin to an immense spiritual and psychological unshackling. If we view Generation Z in a symbolic way, they are a manifestation of the final rejection of White guilt. We have immense work ahead of us, and although it often seems impossibly daunting, the coming winds of change favour us.
 | A guest post by
|