Excellent, if lengthy dissertation. The analysis is profound, the diagnosis accurate.... But, at the risk of oversimplification, I believe that a) it is too difficult and too late to escape the trap we have allowed to imprison Western culture since the 1960s - b) There is only one possible (if improbable) escape and that is a bloody civil war.... The Liberal Progressive, Marxist, anti-white meta-code is too entrenched in EVERY institution to be possibly defeated by legal, political (electoral), educational, populist movements. Any attempt to change will be met with repression by the Governments, and violence by the racial groups, the "migrants" and the muslim masses. Only a kinetic conflict will decide the outcome.
You are simplifying or simply misreading what the article says. It does not argue that systems are "structurally dependent" on the environment or other systems. Rather: "The key point here is that anything a cell (or system) does is determined by its internal structure (the components inside the cell and the relations among them). While autopoietic systems exist within environments that shaped them, they are operationally autonomous. Maturana and Varela thus came up with the term “structural coupling” to designate the selective exchanges between a system and its environment (which includes other functionally differentiated systems), where each system produces “irritations” or perturbations inside other systems, without losing its identity or operational autonomy.
Luhmann transferred the theory of autopoietic biological systems to social systems, arguing that modern society is characterized by the functional differentiation of relatively autonomous subsystems (economy, law, politics, science, education, mass media, art, religion), each of which operates according to its own internal binary code and discourses. For example, science operates on the code true/false, the economy on payment/non-payment, politics on power/no power (or government/opposition), and the media on information/noninformation. A function system can be identified only to the degree to which it has differentiated itself from its environment and from other systems."
Excellent, if lengthy dissertation. The analysis is profound, the diagnosis accurate.... But, at the risk of oversimplification, I believe that a) it is too difficult and too late to escape the trap we have allowed to imprison Western culture since the 1960s - b) There is only one possible (if improbable) escape and that is a bloody civil war.... The Liberal Progressive, Marxist, anti-white meta-code is too entrenched in EVERY institution to be possibly defeated by legal, political (electoral), educational, populist movements. Any attempt to change will be met with repression by the Governments, and violence by the racial groups, the "migrants" and the muslim masses. Only a kinetic conflict will decide the outcome.
You are simplifying or simply misreading what the article says. It does not argue that systems are "structurally dependent" on the environment or other systems. Rather: "The key point here is that anything a cell (or system) does is determined by its internal structure (the components inside the cell and the relations among them). While autopoietic systems exist within environments that shaped them, they are operationally autonomous. Maturana and Varela thus came up with the term “structural coupling” to designate the selective exchanges between a system and its environment (which includes other functionally differentiated systems), where each system produces “irritations” or perturbations inside other systems, without losing its identity or operational autonomy.
Luhmann transferred the theory of autopoietic biological systems to social systems, arguing that modern society is characterized by the functional differentiation of relatively autonomous subsystems (economy, law, politics, science, education, mass media, art, religion), each of which operates according to its own internal binary code and discourses. For example, science operates on the code true/false, the economy on payment/non-payment, politics on power/no power (or government/opposition), and the media on information/noninformation. A function system can be identified only to the degree to which it has differentiated itself from its environment and from other systems."