All the current ills are blanketed to post-enlightenment thought and right after that you go on to give a democratic argument for the permanence of Islam… ah numbers or global percentage are what matters? Where did that come from? Was this how people thought post or pre enlightenment?
What happens to expanded numbers when those expanding them fall? The faster we fall, the faster you fall. Hence the strategy of a rapid fall actually solves the entire thing. Your numbers are inseparable from the infrastructure that sustains you through trade and aid both foreign and domestic.
Then talking of genocide and the moral shortcomings of the west as if Muslims are any better. To establish Pakistan, Muslims committed genocide. There is actually not one place where you are not hostile with the majority or abusive towards the minority, there are just not as many cameras and globalist organizations reporting on it. It’s almost like you have the same world view of globalists that the west is the only place that genocides or that expanding Palestinians and then not feeding them is genocide. If so this doom is going to mean a lot of genocide for Arabs with extremely expanded numbers. What unnaturally goes up eventually comes back down, but keep believing in some democratic quantitative notion of value. You have 2 billion hominids now… what a crash that will be when the gravy train ends.
You then go on to talk of china being against the encroachment of the west and then one of the ills of the west is the surveillance state. It’s like you are completely unaware of the hypocrisy. I am not for globalism but I’m not going to act like the control through tech isn’t happening at a greater rate in China. They at least know how to control muslim populations it seems…. Without UN presence.
Let’s not pretend everyone else is friends beyond hatred for the west… and after the fall of a common enemy, such friends always turn on each other. It’s happens for millennia and will again. I don’t think your numbers will matter much at that point. Then all the blame of all ills will be flung around in a different and no less hypocritical direction.
I love how the appeal to Christian restraint and even overly compassionate nature with enemies is added in there… totally hasn’t pathologized into aspects of globalism. I wonder how much compassion was show to Christians at the fall of Constantinople? As dhimmis in Islamic lands, especially Sunni.
If 'Islam = Evil' per what you insinuate... here's what you need to do:
In Yemen, every 9-year-old can use a Kalashnikov & by the time they become 18+, they can build ATGMs, Sea Mines, etc, from Scratch & (if needed) destroy tanks & rob Cargo Ships.
The Country has hundreds of thousands of militiamen & pirates. There are no gun laws & everyone is armed to the teeth courtesy of the martial culture prevalent there.
If you genuinely believe 'Islam = Evil,' then you should visit Yemen & (assuming you are correct), the so-called 'savages' there would not let you live for even a few mere moments.
This would (in effect) decisively demonstrate that 'you are correct.'
...But we both know you lack conviction in your beliefs & would never do such a thing. Nor are you sure yourself that the Yemeni people (some of the Bravest, Best & Most Hospitable in the world) would even lay a finger on you should you visit.
Hint: Not only will nothing happen to you, but the Yemeni people would treat you with far more hospitality than many self-described 'civilized' people elsewhere.
Also I never said Islam is evil. I find it to be simplistic and dysgenic. I called out your hypocrisy which seem quite common with Muslims.
Critique a Muslim and they think you’re evil then they will kill you (literally what you said Yemenis would do). Muslims call others evil for doing the same with far less volatility. Muslims want to be handled with kiddie gloves for your extreme sensitivities akin to misgendering a lunatic liberal. You write a bunch of hypocritical inconsistent gibberish.
Rose does not say anything like that and her post has a lot more which you do not address. Yemeni people have nothing to do with the discussion here. Creating and attacking straw man seems to be your only response.
I have no interest in ‘Wall of Text’ Tl;drs which sidestep away from the gist of the matter. I brought up the lovely Yemeni people precisely because they are excellent exemplars of Islamic etiquette and manners.
What a BS hypocritical reply. You consume 2000 words in your post, and consider a 200 word reply a wall of text. As for muslim etiquette, one just has to read the evil koran, study the life of the fake prophet and study the history of islam to know what real muslim etiquette is. They yemenis may have excellent etiquette - that is their humanism which has survived the teaching of the evil book, not because they learned from it.
I have said all there is to say on the subject of islam; I will not reply any more.
If you wish to be with those Westerners who have chosen to make an enemy of the World, thereby becoming Pariahs slated for Total Destruction & DOOM... so be it! That is your choice to make.
LoL ... calling a spade a spade gets one blocked. This is what I expect from someone brought up on the evil book. But I didn't expect this from Arktos, where I have read some other far more noble and thought provoking posts. That's why your drivel elicits such replies. You do not deserve to be on this magazine. If Arktos welcomes rubbish like yours I put Arktos in the bin.
I’ve seen tons of videos of Arabs blowing themselves up accidentally. It’s good to be martial, but organizational capacity is why Rome beat the Briton rebellion (not a moral judgment as I wish it went the opposite way). The wars are creating hardened youth and war gangs. That doesn’t tell me much about quality.
True western culture is also martial but capable. It is the decadence that robs the spirit. That people are willing to die and kill when they are in a war torn country is not miraculous but normal.
Conviction doesn’t mean I would walk into my own demise pointlessly lol. So wait you’re saying they are amazing people because they would kill me if I said they were evil…. But Israelis are evil for doing the same via war of attrition with Palestinians? And I’m supposed to want to regain a Christianity that is fair with enemies but calling your great people evil means they should kill me.
There have been plenty of white women foolish enough to go to Muslim counties thinking they will find friends and be enriched and wind up dead. It happens literally all the time even some that are championing the victimhood of them. I don’t have pathological altruism or buy into such nonsense.
I could be wrong but what I understood from his talk of the moral shortcomings of the west is the inconsistency of the dominant egalitarian humanistic narrative with the rationalisations that western liberal elites make for what Israel is doing.
I don’t think he was talking about the evils of the crusades or colonialism. Whatever “evil” was done during these “traditional wars” was honest.
Honest in the sense that these wars were not fought in the name of democracy or human rights.
The Crusades were a response to Islamic expansion and Colonialism was motivated by National interests.
In the article he spoke of the Virtues of Christian Civilisation. He included in that the martial virtues (the Hadith at the start). I presume that he includes in that, the conduct of Christian men during “traditional wars”.
If there was an appeal in the article to westerners (as far as I understood it) it was that the dominant liberal order has damaged both the west and Muslims.
The damage done to the west is obvious... the damage to Muslims by trying to absorb the Muslim world, culturally by trying to secularise it and politically with Neo-Con wars in the MidEast.
Westerners are sick of Muslims generally and their presence in the west especially.
The Muslim problem is due to the globalist desire to modernise the Muslim world and diversify the west.
Not saying that we’d get along had it not been for globalism, but that there would be an understanding that we are different with the hope that each would keep to his own.
Islam is here to stay in the west and we must make peace with that. True traditionalists know that Islam is not actually an enemy, but rather a legitimate tradition that can be extremely beneficial to those who have the ears to hear and the eyes to see. Islam is going to force the liberal hegemony to answer questions that call its legitimacy into question and I can’t be happier for that to happen.
Pour ce qui est de l'occident actuel, ne pas y voir la vérité elle même serait pure folie, mais le matérialisme importé dans le monde entier est, en train de tuer tout esprit et âmes, et même dans les pays musulmans, si ce n'est une minorité, l'ensemble est sous sa domination.
This speech by Greg Felton on his book The Host and the Parasite is the most important central intelligence analysis Americans and the UN Security Council need to hear - stop the election now until a special session of the UN hears this indictment of Israeli-American traitors occupying the US since 1980
there was a time when I thought there could be dialogue, but over time i realized that was just another deceit.
take note, your culture is just as bloated, rotten and empty as our own, and slowly but surely you will see it for yourself.
like two great beast these cultures clash, neither realizing they are infected with rabies and indeed their DOOM is upon them.
after these two beasts have died those left will see clearly that christianity and islam were the anti-traditions devouring all human society in the first place.
If this is how you feel, then nothing less than Total Defeat is your Lot as the 'West' you stand for is surrounded on all sides & Destroyed (on every feasible level). The era of 'long decline' is over, & the era of 'short, rapid Kinetics' is upon us... lest things change now, with speed.
The Good News is, there are reasonable, prudent voices who don't share your sentiments & are more than willing, ready & able to engage in a Dialogue of Civilizations with not just us, but the rest of Humanity as well, thereby settling for an Amicable Resolution of matters.
i am not against any sort of dialogue, i simply understand it will be fraudulent on all sides.
you have no idea of what i stand for.
it is not hard to see that the islamic world and china are just as rotten as the west, so your threats are irrelevant.
all these traditions are in their last gasp for power and control of a system they cannot understand, nor maintain. a system that will continuously devour them from the inside.
and I for one am glad to see all of them die (and a bit sad as well, i admit), that tradition is reborn.
so get your kinetics on my friend, but don't be surprised if you don't like the results.
In our Clash with Turan, we lost almost a third of our numbers (i.e. 12 million out of 40 million Muslims, out of a World Population of 400 million), meaning we know a thing or two about what a "Clash of Civilizations" looks like.
The 'West" you stand for meanwhile has never engaged in such a thing... & it will be fighting three Concurrent fronts against the Sinic, Islamic & Orthodox worlds. This is not tenable, & you would be Wise & Prudent to Negotiate a Settlement.
If not, then again... it doesn't matter what you the individual believe; by your reluctance to come to Dialogue & prevent this monstrous outcome & Clash... you are basically pursuing a pathway to Total Annihilation for your Civilization.
Once Again: It is good to know that you do not 'speak for the West,' & there are more sane, reasoned & prudent voices willing to Speak Out & Negotiate.
clearly you don't understand the situation. You are here with smug self righteous malice and claim you want to speak of negotiation and reasonable discourse. this is but one example of why there will be no discourse. you fail to see the sickness within your own society and the sino-sphere as well.
the clash of civilizations is irrelevant to the metaphysical disease eating all of them up from the inside. talk of tradition is hot air, when you can go travel anywhere and see folks don't know how to live it anymore. many would blame the west as the cause of this, or its enforcer, but that is not the case. if our entire system and people vanished suddenly it would be easier to see. surely what man among us does not yearn for days gone by?
this sickness won't be going anywhere for a while. and there will be no honest negotiations from our side, or yours. you will see this for yourself, if you get over yourself.
think of the situation! here we are, two nobodies talking about things we have very little control over. not the kings of ancient days negotiating reality. this very conversation is a symptom of the sickness that affects both societies. your anti western malice blinds you to the illness in your own society, but pay close attention. this clash of civilizations is irrelevant. who which rabid dog wins a fight? they are both dead.
If you are unable to see the coming Global War (which will be Tri-frontal) & How the West will be utterly destroyed in it... opting instead to speak at length about 'But these other Civilizations are also rotting!'...
... You have not understood the Gravity of the coming DOOM.
& so, You are not taking this Subject seriously, & have your 'head in the clouds.'
Meaning, you are de facto with that 'West' which is sowing the seeds for its own destruction.
everyone here at arktos has seen the coming war for quite a while. your self righteous anti-white mindset blinds you to the whole meaning of my response in the first place. your childish internet threats don't impress anyone.
your anti western malice is far more apparent than any real interest in restoration of any tradition. if you did you would see China is unfortunately just as much an anti-traditional monstrosity as the west, and that what ever operations they decide to engage in certainly wont go well for anyone interested tradition. you clearly don't have any understanding of what the traditionalist are actually fighting for, you are too busy hating the west.
kill everyone in the west, it will not restore what you want, that is if you are truly pro-traditional, and not just another animal foaming at the mouth with anti western malice.
if you and your giant international army you command were serious, you would be sniping international money powers instead of abusing working class white children who have been robbed of their own traditions by these people. but you wont, because folks like you are indoctrinated with anti-white malice, and that is far more important to you than tradition. in all respects, this anti-traditional elite that rules us controls your minds, and has picked your targets for you, and you don't even see it.
get your army and start taking cities and putting your flags up, or stop making blowhard threatening articles with a thin veneer of negotiation for healthy traditions. maybe after giving that a good try you will understand why i speak of the much broader metaphysical sickness engulfing the whole planet.
Until Muslims (in general) treat women (especially Muslim women) as well as the Muslim men wish to be treated, all these "Prefatory Remarks" ring hollow. Not that in any non-Muslim society are women treated as they should (in every way) but Muslims have their "law" as "religiously authorized" and enshrined in an ancient book no different than any other 'mind controlled op' put forth today. Until enough (especially those who wield power) in the Muslim world are able to face the mirror of their own conscience in regard to the way Sharia 'law" prescribes women are to be treated (especially in circumstances involving anything that could be called "sexual" in nature) - as to where each stands in regard to their actions and/or heart, they'll remain alive in body, only, but with a dead spirit and a disconnected soul (if any shred of either even still exists).
The Hadith that the Shia consider canonical are considered by the Sunni mainstream as being ‘outside the fold’ with regard to evidentiary standards. So they can choose to believe that, but it would be a sectarian innovation.
You are Shia, meaning you are in the category of Muslim... however, you are a heretic & sectarian given the sundry Shia proclivities (such as disrespecting the Companions & whatnot).
Not at all. Also, what are your qualifications to speak on this matter?
The scholars of old have already classified the sundry hadith into several categories, & this is a subject that all 4 Sunni Madhabs (Hanafi, Shafii, Maliki & Hanbali) agree upon ... i.e., that the Shii classification of Hadith uses standards that fall short.
Response
All the current ills are blanketed to post-enlightenment thought and right after that you go on to give a democratic argument for the permanence of Islam… ah numbers or global percentage are what matters? Where did that come from? Was this how people thought post or pre enlightenment?
What happens to expanded numbers when those expanding them fall? The faster we fall, the faster you fall. Hence the strategy of a rapid fall actually solves the entire thing. Your numbers are inseparable from the infrastructure that sustains you through trade and aid both foreign and domestic.
Then talking of genocide and the moral shortcomings of the west as if Muslims are any better. To establish Pakistan, Muslims committed genocide. There is actually not one place where you are not hostile with the majority or abusive towards the minority, there are just not as many cameras and globalist organizations reporting on it. It’s almost like you have the same world view of globalists that the west is the only place that genocides or that expanding Palestinians and then not feeding them is genocide. If so this doom is going to mean a lot of genocide for Arabs with extremely expanded numbers. What unnaturally goes up eventually comes back down, but keep believing in some democratic quantitative notion of value. You have 2 billion hominids now… what a crash that will be when the gravy train ends.
You then go on to talk of china being against the encroachment of the west and then one of the ills of the west is the surveillance state. It’s like you are completely unaware of the hypocrisy. I am not for globalism but I’m not going to act like the control through tech isn’t happening at a greater rate in China. They at least know how to control muslim populations it seems…. Without UN presence.
Let’s not pretend everyone else is friends beyond hatred for the west… and after the fall of a common enemy, such friends always turn on each other. It’s happens for millennia and will again. I don’t think your numbers will matter much at that point. Then all the blame of all ills will be flung around in a different and no less hypocritical direction.
I love how the appeal to Christian restraint and even overly compassionate nature with enemies is added in there… totally hasn’t pathologized into aspects of globalism. I wonder how much compassion was show to Christians at the fall of Constantinople? As dhimmis in Islamic lands, especially Sunni.
Wall of Text, tl;dr. I'll keep it very simple:
If 'Islam = Evil' per what you insinuate... here's what you need to do:
In Yemen, every 9-year-old can use a Kalashnikov & by the time they become 18+, they can build ATGMs, Sea Mines, etc, from Scratch & (if needed) destroy tanks & rob Cargo Ships.
The Country has hundreds of thousands of militiamen & pirates. There are no gun laws & everyone is armed to the teeth courtesy of the martial culture prevalent there.
If you genuinely believe 'Islam = Evil,' then you should visit Yemen & (assuming you are correct), the so-called 'savages' there would not let you live for even a few mere moments.
This would (in effect) decisively demonstrate that 'you are correct.'
...But we both know you lack conviction in your beliefs & would never do such a thing. Nor are you sure yourself that the Yemeni people (some of the Bravest, Best & Most Hospitable in the world) would even lay a finger on you should you visit.
Hint: Not only will nothing happen to you, but the Yemeni people would treat you with far more hospitality than many self-described 'civilized' people elsewhere.
Also I never said Islam is evil. I find it to be simplistic and dysgenic. I called out your hypocrisy which seem quite common with Muslims.
Critique a Muslim and they think you’re evil then they will kill you (literally what you said Yemenis would do). Muslims call others evil for doing the same with far less volatility. Muslims want to be handled with kiddie gloves for your extreme sensitivities akin to misgendering a lunatic liberal. You write a bunch of hypocritical inconsistent gibberish.
Rose does not say anything like that and her post has a lot more which you do not address. Yemeni people have nothing to do with the discussion here. Creating and attacking straw man seems to be your only response.
I have no interest in ‘Wall of Text’ Tl;drs which sidestep away from the gist of the matter. I brought up the lovely Yemeni people precisely because they are excellent exemplars of Islamic etiquette and manners.
What a BS hypocritical reply. You consume 2000 words in your post, and consider a 200 word reply a wall of text. As for muslim etiquette, one just has to read the evil koran, study the life of the fake prophet and study the history of islam to know what real muslim etiquette is. They yemenis may have excellent etiquette - that is their humanism which has survived the teaching of the evil book, not because they learned from it.
I have said all there is to say on the subject of islam; I will not reply any more.
You are Blocked for Blatant Disrespect.
If you wish to be with those Westerners who have chosen to make an enemy of the World, thereby becoming Pariahs slated for Total Destruction & DOOM... so be it! That is your choice to make.
LoL ... calling a spade a spade gets one blocked. This is what I expect from someone brought up on the evil book. But I didn't expect this from Arktos, where I have read some other far more noble and thought provoking posts. That's why your drivel elicits such replies. You do not deserve to be on this magazine. If Arktos welcomes rubbish like yours I put Arktos in the bin.
I’ve seen tons of videos of Arabs blowing themselves up accidentally. It’s good to be martial, but organizational capacity is why Rome beat the Briton rebellion (not a moral judgment as I wish it went the opposite way). The wars are creating hardened youth and war gangs. That doesn’t tell me much about quality.
True western culture is also martial but capable. It is the decadence that robs the spirit. That people are willing to die and kill when they are in a war torn country is not miraculous but normal.
Conviction doesn’t mean I would walk into my own demise pointlessly lol. So wait you’re saying they are amazing people because they would kill me if I said they were evil…. But Israelis are evil for doing the same via war of attrition with Palestinians? And I’m supposed to want to regain a Christianity that is fair with enemies but calling your great people evil means they should kill me.
There have been plenty of white women foolish enough to go to Muslim counties thinking they will find friends and be enriched and wind up dead. It happens literally all the time even some that are championing the victimhood of them. I don’t have pathological altruism or buy into such nonsense.
I could be wrong but what I understood from his talk of the moral shortcomings of the west is the inconsistency of the dominant egalitarian humanistic narrative with the rationalisations that western liberal elites make for what Israel is doing.
I don’t think he was talking about the evils of the crusades or colonialism. Whatever “evil” was done during these “traditional wars” was honest.
Honest in the sense that these wars were not fought in the name of democracy or human rights.
The Crusades were a response to Islamic expansion and Colonialism was motivated by National interests.
In the article he spoke of the Virtues of Christian Civilisation. He included in that the martial virtues (the Hadith at the start). I presume that he includes in that, the conduct of Christian men during “traditional wars”.
If there was an appeal in the article to westerners (as far as I understood it) it was that the dominant liberal order has damaged both the west and Muslims.
The damage done to the west is obvious... the damage to Muslims by trying to absorb the Muslim world, culturally by trying to secularise it and politically with Neo-Con wars in the MidEast.
Westerners are sick of Muslims generally and their presence in the west especially.
The Muslim problem is due to the globalist desire to modernise the Muslim world and diversify the west.
Not saying that we’d get along had it not been for globalism, but that there would be an understanding that we are different with the hope that each would keep to his own.
Sorry if it sounds like a rant.
Precisely.
Also, the ‘Wall of Text’ Tl;dr presented at the outset is a complete sidestep from the objective of these prefatory remarks.
That said, Thank You Good Sir for taking the time to emphasize *some* of the key objectives I sought to pursue overall.
LoL ... This wall of text is OK with you.
What a hypocrite!
Islam is here to stay in the west and we must make peace with that. True traditionalists know that Islam is not actually an enemy, but rather a legitimate tradition that can be extremely beneficial to those who have the ears to hear and the eyes to see. Islam is going to force the liberal hegemony to answer questions that call its legitimacy into question and I can’t be happier for that to happen.
Precisely.
It's a shame to see Arktos lowering it's editorial standards to allow such one-sided, juvenile essays on its site.
The Prefatory remarks are one sided on purpose:
It is to exclude that ‘West’ who will be defeated on the battlefield & not spoken to given their anti human tendencies.
The ‘other West’… that is to whom the remaining segments of the essay series will be addressed.
So it’s good to see I got precisely that visceral reaction I sought out!
"anti-human tendencies"... like the way Islamic women are treated? What could be more anti-human?
Muslim women have children & live fulfilled lives.
Western women have been abolished.
End of Discussion!
Pour ce qui est de l'occident actuel, ne pas y voir la vérité elle même serait pure folie, mais le matérialisme importé dans le monde entier est, en train de tuer tout esprit et âmes, et même dans les pays musulmans, si ce n'est une minorité, l'ensemble est sous sa domination.
This speech by Greg Felton on his book The Host and the Parasite is the most important central intelligence analysis Americans and the UN Security Council need to hear - stop the election now until a special session of the UN hears this indictment of Israeli-American traitors occupying the US since 1980
Sent from my iPhone
there was a time when I thought there could be dialogue, but over time i realized that was just another deceit.
take note, your culture is just as bloated, rotten and empty as our own, and slowly but surely you will see it for yourself.
like two great beast these cultures clash, neither realizing they are infected with rabies and indeed their DOOM is upon them.
after these two beasts have died those left will see clearly that christianity and islam were the anti-traditions devouring all human society in the first place.
If this is how you feel, then nothing less than Total Defeat is your Lot as the 'West' you stand for is surrounded on all sides & Destroyed (on every feasible level). The era of 'long decline' is over, & the era of 'short, rapid Kinetics' is upon us... lest things change now, with speed.
The Good News is, there are reasonable, prudent voices who don't share your sentiments & are more than willing, ready & able to engage in a Dialogue of Civilizations with not just us, but the rest of Humanity as well, thereby settling for an Amicable Resolution of matters.
i am not against any sort of dialogue, i simply understand it will be fraudulent on all sides.
you have no idea of what i stand for.
it is not hard to see that the islamic world and china are just as rotten as the west, so your threats are irrelevant.
all these traditions are in their last gasp for power and control of a system they cannot understand, nor maintain. a system that will continuously devour them from the inside.
and I for one am glad to see all of them die (and a bit sad as well, i admit), that tradition is reborn.
so get your kinetics on my friend, but don't be surprised if you don't like the results.
Hardly.
In our Clash with Turan, we lost almost a third of our numbers (i.e. 12 million out of 40 million Muslims, out of a World Population of 400 million), meaning we know a thing or two about what a "Clash of Civilizations" looks like.
The 'West" you stand for meanwhile has never engaged in such a thing... & it will be fighting three Concurrent fronts against the Sinic, Islamic & Orthodox worlds. This is not tenable, & you would be Wise & Prudent to Negotiate a Settlement.
If not, then again... it doesn't matter what you the individual believe; by your reluctance to come to Dialogue & prevent this monstrous outcome & Clash... you are basically pursuing a pathway to Total Annihilation for your Civilization.
Once Again: It is good to know that you do not 'speak for the West,' & there are more sane, reasoned & prudent voices willing to Speak Out & Negotiate.
clearly you don't understand the situation. You are here with smug self righteous malice and claim you want to speak of negotiation and reasonable discourse. this is but one example of why there will be no discourse. you fail to see the sickness within your own society and the sino-sphere as well.
the clash of civilizations is irrelevant to the metaphysical disease eating all of them up from the inside. talk of tradition is hot air, when you can go travel anywhere and see folks don't know how to live it anymore. many would blame the west as the cause of this, or its enforcer, but that is not the case. if our entire system and people vanished suddenly it would be easier to see. surely what man among us does not yearn for days gone by?
this sickness won't be going anywhere for a while. and there will be no honest negotiations from our side, or yours. you will see this for yourself, if you get over yourself.
think of the situation! here we are, two nobodies talking about things we have very little control over. not the kings of ancient days negotiating reality. this very conversation is a symptom of the sickness that affects both societies. your anti western malice blinds you to the illness in your own society, but pay close attention. this clash of civilizations is irrelevant. who which rabid dog wins a fight? they are both dead.
This back-&-forth is over:
If you are unable to see the coming Global War (which will be Tri-frontal) & How the West will be utterly destroyed in it... opting instead to speak at length about 'But these other Civilizations are also rotting!'...
... You have not understood the Gravity of the coming DOOM.
& so, You are not taking this Subject seriously, & have your 'head in the clouds.'
Meaning, you are de facto with that 'West' which is sowing the seeds for its own destruction.
everyone here at arktos has seen the coming war for quite a while. your self righteous anti-white mindset blinds you to the whole meaning of my response in the first place. your childish internet threats don't impress anyone.
your anti western malice is far more apparent than any real interest in restoration of any tradition. if you did you would see China is unfortunately just as much an anti-traditional monstrosity as the west, and that what ever operations they decide to engage in certainly wont go well for anyone interested tradition. you clearly don't have any understanding of what the traditionalist are actually fighting for, you are too busy hating the west.
kill everyone in the west, it will not restore what you want, that is if you are truly pro-traditional, and not just another animal foaming at the mouth with anti western malice.
if you and your giant international army you command were serious, you would be sniping international money powers instead of abusing working class white children who have been robbed of their own traditions by these people. but you wont, because folks like you are indoctrinated with anti-white malice, and that is far more important to you than tradition. in all respects, this anti-traditional elite that rules us controls your minds, and has picked your targets for you, and you don't even see it.
get your army and start taking cities and putting your flags up, or stop making blowhard threatening articles with a thin veneer of negotiation for healthy traditions. maybe after giving that a good try you will understand why i speak of the much broader metaphysical sickness engulfing the whole planet.
Until Muslims (in general) treat women (especially Muslim women) as well as the Muslim men wish to be treated, all these "Prefatory Remarks" ring hollow. Not that in any non-Muslim society are women treated as they should (in every way) but Muslims have their "law" as "religiously authorized" and enshrined in an ancient book no different than any other 'mind controlled op' put forth today. Until enough (especially those who wield power) in the Muslim world are able to face the mirror of their own conscience in regard to the way Sharia 'law" prescribes women are to be treated (especially in circumstances involving anything that could be called "sexual" in nature) - as to where each stands in regard to their actions and/or heart, they'll remain alive in body, only, but with a dead spirit and a disconnected soul (if any shred of either even still exists).
Moot Point.
There are no Women left in the West; they have been Abolished by the 'Alphabet brigade'
Muslim Women get married, have kids & live fulfilled lives.
Please refrain from spamming such silliness. This will be your only warning.
The Hadith that the Shia consider canonical are considered by the Sunni mainstream as being ‘outside the fold’ with regard to evidentiary standards. So they can choose to believe that, but it would be a sectarian innovation.
"Textual analysis of most Hadith chains in general show them to be fabrications"
Our scholars identified the fabricated hadith for classification purposes. You can even purchase whole tomes of them.
This is not a 'multi generation game of Telephone,' it is a look at Testimonial chains & the filtering out of the wheat from the chaff.
That said, unless you have the requisite qualifications to speak on this matter (as noted earlier), these points are basically Moot.
Hardly, just stating the facts.
You are Shia, meaning you are in the category of Muslim... however, you are a heretic & sectarian given the sundry Shia proclivities (such as disrespecting the Companions & whatnot).
Ok, so that means while a Muslim... you are nevertheless unqualified to speak on these matters given heretical/sectarian proclivities.
Thank You for clarifying!
Not at all. Also, what are your qualifications to speak on this matter?
The scholars of old have already classified the sundry hadith into several categories, & this is a subject that all 4 Sunni Madhabs (Hanafi, Shafii, Maliki & Hanbali) agree upon ... i.e., that the Shii classification of Hadith uses standards that fall short.
Relevant Reader on navigating sectarianism: https://seekersguidance.org/reader/reader-on-navigating-sectarianism/