The reason why Modi changed the India's name to Bharat was also largely because the opposition parties of 28 in total, has named their alliance name as INDIA itself - full form (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA). The opposition alliance aims to contest the coming 2024 elections against the Modi's party.
I dislike also how china is given the green light because they built themselves off the west but no agency for bringing more people into consumerism. Their economy is heavily built off of supplying consumption, and they are as much responsible for it (and true environmental harm) as drug dealers are for addiction. If I’m supposed to blame the west and even regular people on a purely ideological level, I want ideological consistency.
Like liberalism, traditionalists just hate regular whites and want an easy place to blame.
Maybe traditional Indians can dislike colonization but still see they faired better under it than Hindus did when Pakistan was formed… and they also see that colonization helped to protect them against Islamist expansion and colonization.
India’s GDP is about 50% service based with almost 10% of their GDP being IT services to the West and Europe. Part of globalism is the interconnected aspects of trade itself, not just “western” hegemony. Almost 20% of china’s exports are to the “west”. The more western hegemony implodes, the more these too will and create a vacuum. Russia is in a good position in that it’s increasingly not dependent on trade and has vast resources but the other Poles don’t.
It’s interesting that colonization created the unified Indian identity and the Hindu unified religion… yet others that broke away from colonization are given all blame for it and branded with the idea that there is no identity. Why is it that old American lines don’t have a continuing origin myth because they combined various lines of European identity, but this is not the same for India? Furthermore, why is it that Whites hold all agency for globalism even when it too blames us, yet it can infect any that are affluent as is seen with Sunak?
Is Silicon Valley not at all a globalist supporter and hub? Indians contributing to this is seen as progressing? So moving in the direction of the west in all markers of quantifiable competition to have an equilibrium or egalitarian piece of the pie? Nothing inherently wrong with the system itself just it’s lack of distribution to other civilizational states? If old American and western lines wanted to have our RSS it’s called white nationalism and liberal. Why the double standard?
The underlying value system of this reasoning is that anything that makes power more equal between various groups is inherently good, without considering the very nature of what corrupted the west being a part of that quantifiable egalitarianism.
The reason why Modi changed the India's name to Bharat was also largely because the opposition parties of 28 in total, has named their alliance name as INDIA itself - full form (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA). The opposition alliance aims to contest the coming 2024 elections against the Modi's party.
I dislike also how china is given the green light because they built themselves off the west but no agency for bringing more people into consumerism. Their economy is heavily built off of supplying consumption, and they are as much responsible for it (and true environmental harm) as drug dealers are for addiction. If I’m supposed to blame the west and even regular people on a purely ideological level, I want ideological consistency.
Like liberalism, traditionalists just hate regular whites and want an easy place to blame.
Maybe traditional Indians can dislike colonization but still see they faired better under it than Hindus did when Pakistan was formed… and they also see that colonization helped to protect them against Islamist expansion and colonization.
India’s GDP is about 50% service based with almost 10% of their GDP being IT services to the West and Europe. Part of globalism is the interconnected aspects of trade itself, not just “western” hegemony. Almost 20% of china’s exports are to the “west”. The more western hegemony implodes, the more these too will and create a vacuum. Russia is in a good position in that it’s increasingly not dependent on trade and has vast resources but the other Poles don’t.
It’s interesting that colonization created the unified Indian identity and the Hindu unified religion… yet others that broke away from colonization are given all blame for it and branded with the idea that there is no identity. Why is it that old American lines don’t have a continuing origin myth because they combined various lines of European identity, but this is not the same for India? Furthermore, why is it that Whites hold all agency for globalism even when it too blames us, yet it can infect any that are affluent as is seen with Sunak?
Is Silicon Valley not at all a globalist supporter and hub? Indians contributing to this is seen as progressing? So moving in the direction of the west in all markers of quantifiable competition to have an equilibrium or egalitarian piece of the pie? Nothing inherently wrong with the system itself just it’s lack of distribution to other civilizational states? If old American and western lines wanted to have our RSS it’s called white nationalism and liberal. Why the double standard?
The underlying value system of this reasoning is that anything that makes power more equal between various groups is inherently good, without considering the very nature of what corrupted the west being a part of that quantifiable egalitarianism.