Hollywood, online porno, Las Vegas and 48 LGBTQ+ bars in New York city. Not to mention numerous theme parks all across the US. The only reason there is a global shift in world political alignments is that the old system is no longer profitable.
Thalassocratic liberalism. Well after a short trip to the dictionary, got to musing.
His thesis is amplified by the presence of, last I knew, no less than 11 aircraft carrier groups in the USN.
As an ex fast attack vet I can attest to one of our oft repeated expressions. "There are two ships in the Navy, submarines and targets."
Carriers are a strictly offensive weapon, just look how many ships are in a carrier task force. All there to protect the carrier.
I think in a near peer battle the aircraft from a carrier would do immense damage, however they would have to find somewhere besides the carrier to land. The big assumption being they got close enough to their targets in the first place.
The main problem? The expense of military domination leaves scant resources for any real progress for humanity and endless vendettas to be settled.
Am feeling encouraged by some developments, but as the elite paint themselves into a corner, the desperate measures emerge. They can afford to lose, humanity can't.
As a geopolitical distribution of power this is acceptable. But nothing here answers the question : under what circumstances should we slaughter our fellow human beings?
È il globalismo che bisogna combattere perché annienta l'individualità dei popoli, e Dugin è il filosofo che ha fatto del multipolarismo la sua battaglia! Onore a lui che nonostante la perdita della sua amata figlia ha ancora l'energia di propugnare con forza le sue idee.
Hollywood, online porno, Las Vegas and 48 LGBTQ+ bars in New York city. Not to mention numerous theme parks all across the US. The only reason there is a global shift in world political alignments is that the old system is no longer profitable.
Joeman out.
Thalassocratic liberalism. Well after a short trip to the dictionary, got to musing.
His thesis is amplified by the presence of, last I knew, no less than 11 aircraft carrier groups in the USN.
As an ex fast attack vet I can attest to one of our oft repeated expressions. "There are two ships in the Navy, submarines and targets."
Carriers are a strictly offensive weapon, just look how many ships are in a carrier task force. All there to protect the carrier.
I think in a near peer battle the aircraft from a carrier would do immense damage, however they would have to find somewhere besides the carrier to land. The big assumption being they got close enough to their targets in the first place.
The main problem? The expense of military domination leaves scant resources for any real progress for humanity and endless vendettas to be settled.
Am feeling encouraged by some developments, but as the elite paint themselves into a corner, the desperate measures emerge. They can afford to lose, humanity can't.
As a geopolitical distribution of power this is acceptable. But nothing here answers the question : under what circumstances should we slaughter our fellow human beings?
È il globalismo che bisogna combattere perché annienta l'individualità dei popoli, e Dugin è il filosofo che ha fatto del multipolarismo la sua battaglia! Onore a lui che nonostante la perdita della sua amata figlia ha ancora l'energia di propugnare con forza le sue idee.