Alexander Markovics argues that recent assassination attempts against Viktor Orbán, Robert Fico, and Donald Trump are part of a broader globalist strategy to eliminate political figures opposing war with Russia and Western globalism, with media and elites fueling the violence.
“Everyone was deeply saddened and shaken by the assassination attempt. The occurrence of assassinations is always surprising, but the fact that the level of violence in Europe is increasing surprises no one.” (Viktor Orbán on Kossuth Radio’s Good Morning, Hungary! program about the assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Fico).
The politics of the entire West, from California to Poland, is dominated by politicians who, despite the emerging defeat against Russia in Ukraine, continue to beat the drums for escalating the war against Moscow. However, on the level of heads of state or leading candidates for the US presidency, there are only three men standing against this madness: Viktor Orbán in Hungary, Robert Fico in Slovakia, and Donald Trump in the US. All three have been demonized and slandered in a terrifying manner by globalist media and NGOs both within and outside their countries: accusations of being bought by foreign powers, of madness, and comparisons to Hitler have culminated in an atmosphere of open hatred and murderous intent against these potential peacemakers. This ultimately led to assassination attempts against all three. But why are the globalists escalating their war against the people at this moment?
Robert Fico — A Leftist Populist Standing Up for His People
Amid protests fueled by liberal-globalist media against the media reform of leftist-populist Prime Minister Robert Fico, an assassination took place. In the central Slovak town of Handlová, Fico was shot at a campaign event by a 71-year-old pensioner, Juraj C., and was in critical condition for several days. The opposition supporter cited Fico’s Ukraine policy and media reforms as the reasons for the attack. His political stance: leftist, progressive, and pro-war. However, Fico had opposed further war escalation and advocated peace with Russia. He shifted Slovak foreign policy by 180 degrees, halted arms deliveries to Kiev, and opposed Ukraine’s NATO membership. For this, opposition media labeled him a “criminal” and “mafia boss” — terms they never used for his warmongering predecessor Peter Pellegrini. Despite public outrage over the attack, opposition media seem unwilling to stop their incitement to murder. On September 7, Fico stated to the press that he was 100% sure another assassination attempt would occur if the political opposition and their allied media did not stop their incitement. Even if Juraj C. acted alone, there are many others ready to strike, fueled by the media’s hate campaign against the Slovak government.
Viktor Orbán — Defender of a Conservative Europe
Among European leaders advocating a change in both EU foreign and domestic policies, Viktor Orbán is the most well-known. Since 2010, the Prime Minister of Hungary has gained international recognition as a combative head of state who defends his country’s Christian heritage against mass immigration, LGBT culture, and now the escalation of the war in Ukraine. Orbán maintains diplomatic relations with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in an effort to broker peace in the Ukraine conflict. This has made him many enemies within the European Commission, as he repeatedly sabotaged EU military support for Ukraine and opposed Kiev’s EU membership.
Orbán has also faced ongoing attacks for his conservative-nationalist policies that promote family protection and Hungarian sovereignty. Most recently, Orbán has advocated peace between the West and Russia in the Ukraine conflict. On July 5, as Orbán was en route to Moscow to advance his peace plans, the unexpected happened. The Hungarian secret service thwarted an assassination attempt, in which a car bomb was meant to kill the prime minister. Hungarian journalists from the platform demokrata.net later published a recorded conversation in which two people speaking Ukrainian mentioned the assassination. Car bomb attacks are typical of the Ukrainian secret service (SBU), which has conducted several such assassinations since 2014, including the killings of Russian politicians and civilians. Sergei Gorenko, one of the leaders of the Luhansk People’s Republic, writer Zakhar Prilepin, and Russian philosopher Darya Dugina were among the victims of car bomb attacks in recent years. As reported by Ukrainskaya Pravda and Sky News, the head of Ukraine’s security service vaguely acknowledged the assassinations in a one-hour TV interview. It has long been speculated that the Ukrainian kill list “Mirotvorets” (“Peacemaker”) is fed by Western intelligence agencies like MI6 and the CIA, which leave it to the Ukrainian SBU and other services to liquidate individuals critical of the Kiev regime. But the peak of the globally motivated wave of assassinations was yet to come.
The Shots at Donald Trump — “Fight, Fight, Fight!”
“Time to put Trump in a bullseye!” These words from sitting President Joe Biden, along with his declaration that he prioritizes freedom over democracy, are examples of the growing threat of civil war in the US, as reported by Deutsche Stimme. Words soon turned into action. On July 13, eight shots were fired at the Republican Party’s presidential candidate and former President Donald Trump at a campaign event using an assault rifle. As Secret Service agents tried to tackle him, Trump defied his incompetent protectors, stood up, and shouted to the crowd, “Fight, fight, fight!” Despite numerous tips from Trump supporters who had noticed the shooter, the Secret Service responded slowly. The investigation into the incident is still ongoing, but the overall picture can generously be described as massive administrative failure — or, with a clear-eyed view, as the deliberate permission of terrible events. Alongside Trump, one person was killed, and several were seriously injured. Fox News has since confirmed through informants within the ranks of the agents present at the event that they admitted to not being properly trained to protect Trump. But who could have an interest in all these assassination attempts?
BlackRock, the Deep State, and Laurence Fink
Shortly after the assassination attempt on Trump, keen observers noticed that the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, had appeared years earlier in a commercial for US giant BlackRock, led by oligarch Laurence “Larry” Fink. But why would BlackRock benefit from this assassination? BlackRock is worth $8.594 trillion, equivalent to the combined GDP of Germany and France. In May 2023, BlackRock founded the Ukrainian Development Fund (UDF), which is intended to finance the country’s reconstruction. As US Senator Lindsey Graham noted in a conversation with Ukrainian President Zelensky on September 6, Ukraine sits on resources worth trillions of dollars. These can serve as collateral for the West and particularly BlackRock if heavily indebted Ukraine declares bankruptcy — a scenario that is becoming increasingly likely as the war progresses. Peace with Russia, which would inevitably lead to the ousting of the Western puppet government in Kiev, would of course run counter to these interests of the deep state — hence the continued sacrifice of lives in Ukraine for the sake of capital.
(Translated from the German)
A useful insight.
Remember also John Magufuli and Shinzo Abe.
And of course the notion of the infamous trail of "Arkancides" in the Untied States and other suspicious incidents in its chief partner on t'other side of the sea.
Thank you for this publication!
Returning to the scene, the occurrences listed in the article all refer to UNSUCCESSFUL assassinations and the possibility that these are, rather, intended to be warnings rather than mortal. In that respect, Donald Trump's incident is pretty clearly one where luck was the principal element of the outcome. So for me it's safe to say for now that these are all genuine attempts, failing only in (a) the altered climate around the global psychology of threat and (b) the developing incompetence (loss of confidence) in the perpetrating organisation(s).
we are in for a frightening time