that’s blatantly obvious. the exact same message could have been sent by giving both perp and victim the same neutral skin tone—like green, or purple—but they had to be all phony about it.
I don't know what's disingenuous about simply sending a message that human beings harassing other humans is wrong, without skin color-coding it in a way that draws viewers away from the primary message to other aspects that in principle have no bearing on the conduct, which is forbidden for everyone. The skin color-coded way the bad behavior is currently being depicted is leading those who see the sign toward ethnicity-related inferences that beckon acrimony, ridicule, and umbrage. Umbrage like this Substack post. Which I get--if the sign were to show up as an IQ test question with a multiple choice answer, test-takers would have ample justification for getting the intended message wrong. Using a neutral shade that no one would confuse with an inference about skin color would obviate the problem.
Thanks for posting, very interesting. This phenom is now seen all over the west, its the very root of the UK problem with Pakistani rape/grooming gangs. In polite society you simply are not allowed to actually name the problem - blindly supported multi-culturalism and lack of integration or assimilation. The exact same thing is happening in Montreal Canada where recent immigrants to Montreal from non-western nations are acting as voyeurs at public pools, and the public is starting to take notice. The MSM wont report on it, but the independent media is reporting on it.
My only comment on the posters (and I do see the glaring hypocrisy) is that in some way maybe it makes sense to use images of the dominant culture (although in this case it would mean the women in the images should be 'white' also) so that the messaging is universal, although that still doesn't address the real issue, which is cultural relativism and lack of proper integration.
I, for one, hope they DO keep up with this stupid nonsense 🙄 bc when our people see it they immediately recognize what role-reversed bullshit it actually is. Most of them any how. A wise man said "never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake!" So let 'em have at it fam. 😄
that’s blatantly obvious. the exact same message could have been sent by giving both perp and victim the same neutral skin tone—like green, or purple—but they had to be all phony about it.
Why be equally disingenuous?
I don't know what's disingenuous about simply sending a message that human beings harassing other humans is wrong, without skin color-coding it in a way that draws viewers away from the primary message to other aspects that in principle have no bearing on the conduct, which is forbidden for everyone. The skin color-coded way the bad behavior is currently being depicted is leading those who see the sign toward ethnicity-related inferences that beckon acrimony, ridicule, and umbrage. Umbrage like this Substack post. Which I get--if the sign were to show up as an IQ test question with a multiple choice answer, test-takers would have ample justification for getting the intended message wrong. Using a neutral shade that no one would confuse with an inference about skin color would obviate the problem.
That sounds a bit like a word salad DC.
shit, consider the topic. The semantic complications preceded my entrance into the conversation. I didn't make the rules.
Granted, some people just want it Simple. It isn't.
Thanks for posting, very interesting. This phenom is now seen all over the west, its the very root of the UK problem with Pakistani rape/grooming gangs. In polite society you simply are not allowed to actually name the problem - blindly supported multi-culturalism and lack of integration or assimilation. The exact same thing is happening in Montreal Canada where recent immigrants to Montreal from non-western nations are acting as voyeurs at public pools, and the public is starting to take notice. The MSM wont report on it, but the independent media is reporting on it.
My only comment on the posters (and I do see the glaring hypocrisy) is that in some way maybe it makes sense to use images of the dominant culture (although in this case it would mean the women in the images should be 'white' also) so that the messaging is universal, although that still doesn't address the real issue, which is cultural relativism and lack of proper integration.
I, for one, hope they DO keep up with this stupid nonsense 🙄 bc when our people see it they immediately recognize what role-reversed bullshit it actually is. Most of them any how. A wise man said "never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake!" So let 'em have at it fam. 😄