If you wish to "communicate" to as many people that are in a position to influence others ..... then cut out 80% of the verbage. Keep it simplier and pointed, imo.
We are in a War, if some don't understand that, then too bad for them. Speak to those that realize we are in a war with advice. Convincing or Explaining is a waste of effort and time, which is short, also my opinion.
This is a good summary of what people on the Right have been saying (and hoping to accomplish) for the last 70+ years...to no avail. And that may be because both the diagnosis and remedy are wrong.
The Right has thrown away every asset it has ever had, specifically the Right's embrace of elitism and various forms of Bolshevist vanguardism as released themselves of the 'burden' of being on the side of ordinary people's customary practices and beliefs.
I propose that anyone - literally anyone - can be a member of 'the vanguard' if they hold even *one* viewpoint that is resistant to 'the free movement of goods, people, symbols and money' because 'free movement' is the materialization of the ideas of liberalism. In this view, 'the vanguard' can be anywhere and is everywhere. This is, in fact, what 'the Left' fears: The next Hitler is living next to them or is selling them candy-bars at the gas station.
If the Right wants to resist 'the Left' it needs to take the side against 'liberalism', against 'the free movement of goods, people, symbols and money', and side with custom, immobility and opacity.
There must be a leadership cadre of leadership at every level.
That’s how the Left initially won.
Disagree on targets; you wish to assail extremely strong targets, deeply resourced with… wishes to… infiltrate?
The truth is, sorry, everything you seem to want the Left has except ideas. Perhaps you… should be honest about what you want?
You are certainly not wanting to get it how they got it. 🩸
You want a movement of intellectuals… like… the Bolsheviks? The Bolsheviks took over Socialism with German gold and the tacit support of the Imperial German army, not ideas.
It is true Ludendorff backed the most disciplined socialists- the Bolsheviks.
What are the Right’s strengths?
They’re not to be found in classrooms. Truckers - Truckers are our current Vanguard, and farmers in Europe. That is your army in waiting.
What does the Right offer?
Let me give you a hint; when Sinn Fein started to run for office 30 years ago they didn’t offer the Revolution and certainly not neoliberalism. They offered safe, drug free neighborhoods and on this they could and did deliver.
It was at the time very dangerous to deal drugs in a Sinn Fein neighborhood. You see crime is very interesting to the locals, and all politics are local. But the stomach lacking you mention… rule out 🩸 and rule out power.
Money and resources are to be found where they exist and support… the cause against the common enemy. a16z.com and American dynamism are a place to go- and they want space, you know. Space. Do you support? That’s Andreesson and Horowitz.
But there’s no reason to invest in something that doesn’t exist.
The Left ended up getting institutional and corporate support because… it existed, and wasn’t shy about working, poverty or 🩸.
As the commenter above said, we’re at war. The Red Russian soldiers and sailors fought not for socialism- they were offered The Vote. The Whites offered nothing. What do you offer?
Build something, then ask for financing. It’s not venture capital, this politics thing.
If you wish to "communicate" to as many people that are in a position to influence others ..... then cut out 80% of the verbage. Keep it simplier and pointed, imo.
We are in a War, if some don't understand that, then too bad for them. Speak to those that realize we are in a war with advice. Convincing or Explaining is a waste of effort and time, which is short, also my opinion.
This is a good summary of what people on the Right have been saying (and hoping to accomplish) for the last 70+ years...to no avail. And that may be because both the diagnosis and remedy are wrong.
The Right has thrown away every asset it has ever had, specifically the Right's embrace of elitism and various forms of Bolshevist vanguardism as released themselves of the 'burden' of being on the side of ordinary people's customary practices and beliefs.
I propose that anyone - literally anyone - can be a member of 'the vanguard' if they hold even *one* viewpoint that is resistant to 'the free movement of goods, people, symbols and money' because 'free movement' is the materialization of the ideas of liberalism. In this view, 'the vanguard' can be anywhere and is everywhere. This is, in fact, what 'the Left' fears: The next Hitler is living next to them or is selling them candy-bars at the gas station.
If the Right wants to resist 'the Left' it needs to take the side against 'liberalism', against 'the free movement of goods, people, symbols and money', and side with custom, immobility and opacity.
Agreed on Vanguard.
There must be a leadership cadre of leadership at every level.
That’s how the Left initially won.
Disagree on targets; you wish to assail extremely strong targets, deeply resourced with… wishes to… infiltrate?
The truth is, sorry, everything you seem to want the Left has except ideas. Perhaps you… should be honest about what you want?
You are certainly not wanting to get it how they got it. 🩸
You want a movement of intellectuals… like… the Bolsheviks? The Bolsheviks took over Socialism with German gold and the tacit support of the Imperial German army, not ideas.
It is true Ludendorff backed the most disciplined socialists- the Bolsheviks.
What are the Right’s strengths?
They’re not to be found in classrooms. Truckers - Truckers are our current Vanguard, and farmers in Europe. That is your army in waiting.
What does the Right offer?
Let me give you a hint; when Sinn Fein started to run for office 30 years ago they didn’t offer the Revolution and certainly not neoliberalism. They offered safe, drug free neighborhoods and on this they could and did deliver.
It was at the time very dangerous to deal drugs in a Sinn Fein neighborhood. You see crime is very interesting to the locals, and all politics are local. But the stomach lacking you mention… rule out 🩸 and rule out power.
Money and resources are to be found where they exist and support… the cause against the common enemy. a16z.com and American dynamism are a place to go- and they want space, you know. Space. Do you support? That’s Andreesson and Horowitz.
But there’s no reason to invest in something that doesn’t exist.
The Left ended up getting institutional and corporate support because… it existed, and wasn’t shy about working, poverty or 🩸.
As the commenter above said, we’re at war. The Red Russian soldiers and sailors fought not for socialism- they were offered The Vote. The Whites offered nothing. What do you offer?
Build something, then ask for financing. It’s not venture capital, this politics thing.