15 Comments
User's avatar
Richard Roskell's avatar

Professor Dugin is a great thinker and I enjoy reading his ideas, with which I mostly agree. However I've noted a tendency for him to think in binary terms about the new world order - he mentions Russia and the USA only. Such an arrangement would be doomed to fail.

You can't sit safely on a stool that has only two legs. Similarly, future that has only two primary powers won't support a stable world order either. Three legs on a stool is the minimum - the ideal, actually - configuration for stability. Likewise geopolitically. Three superpowers, each acting independently but hopefully not antagonistically, is the necessary minimum for a stable world order.

If the new world doesn't include China, Russia and the USA as the three legs of the stool, then it will not survive. For those whose geopolitical thinking remains western-centric, I recommend broadening your perspective.

Expand full comment
Bartolomeu Capita's avatar

Indeed, three legs on a stool is the minimum - the ideal - configuration for stability. China should in no way be excluded. But Russia's president Putin is well aware of this reality, in that he is, seemingly, inviting both president Trump and president Jinping to attend Russia's Victory Day on 9 May 2025. It must in addition be said that Trump needs an amount of support from Russia and China for the success of his revolution at home and on a worldwide scale. The three need to protect one another, as the Deep State is not yet ready to give up...

Expand full comment
M Thomas Robertson's avatar

I would suggest that playing the numbers game, only leads us back to NATO v The rest of the world, whether China imlicitly or explicitly is of the same mindset as Russia.

I prefer to use the binary model, since we are all polemic creatures in a Plasmoid Unverse of polemic enegy fields, necessarilly.

We are hydro-static beings of water and electricity, essentailly, and chilren of our universal qualia.

If we do not recognise our shared nature, we can never provide for our shared needs.

And if we accept the ying and yang of the constant dialectic we simply have to aim to become the sweetspot in the middle, on so many levels

And this requires constant self-analysis and adaptation to competing energy fields.

And a monolithic Global World Order, will evidently, never be effective nor adaptive eithout fexibility and accountability.

NB Why is 'Accountabity' a word found only in an archive of lexicon?

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

China is obviously a major player and would certainly be prominent in the multipolarity mix. Assigning them one of three legs upfront though is a bit fraught with risk. You'd essentially be sending them an engraved invitation to take Taiwan. India and Japan would certainly take exception (to being left out of the equation). There are a lot of combinations of countries in Asia with historic distrust and animosities between them that are powderkegs which could easily ignite requiring careful consideration.

Expand full comment
Franz Kafka's avatar

The big, unmentionable problem is that Zionism is Satanism.

Expand full comment
Mike Lacy's avatar

The Trump Doctrine is the Monroe Doctrine on steroids. The real question is what strength Zionists will have in the JD Vance Administration starting in '29. Although its political class are Zionists, most Americans are not. As the "boomer generation" dies so is Zionism among Americans. Younger Americans are no longer afraid of being smeared as an "antisemite". The heresy of Christian Zionism is dying with the boomers who bought it.

Expand full comment
Paul Repstock's avatar

I wish you are right. But, I am not sure. There are still far too many people who have no courage. Some because they never learned, some because they are enslaved by 'Voluntary Debts'..

Expand full comment
Mike Lacy's avatar

America's religious history is one of extremism, cults and fads.

Expand full comment
Paul Repstock's avatar

We saw during "The mandates" how people who knew better and who violated their beliefs and oaths, just rolled over in submission 90%??

Look how the 'Younger generation' is cowed by the Woke invasion of schools. People can't even defend their children??????????

Expand full comment
Mike Lacy's avatar

It's regional. I live in a state that never had mandates. My county is only 30% vaxxed. We also have no state gun laws. The two are related. Where people can freely defend themselves, the government treads lightly... in fear of the people. That's how it should be, I think.

Expand full comment
David's avatar

Christian Zionism lurks behind the scenes. If the world could wake up to the reality of Israel and if our country could stop its waltz with it. . . China and the interest of the United States ought to be aligned and we can embrace as allies

Expand full comment
Davy Ro's avatar

I agree with a lot of this. But Russia would do very well to steer well clear of any Atlantiist love in. Russia was nearly destroyed from within by easily fooled liberal US loving sheep. There a great movement going on in Russia right now. A confident, Proud, moral, innovative growing Super Power. Realisation amongst it's citizens why Russia is a super power. It's because of themselves , not any other country with their bells & whistles. Russia is for Russians & long may it be that way.

Expand full comment
Autonomy4Life's avatar

There is no force so dangerous than one comprised of members who have nothing left to lose

Expand full comment
Skeptical1's avatar

I’m sure you meant he’s not a geopolitical liberal. As for his general social views, he is a liberal as it gets.

Expand full comment
The Wrong Trousers's avatar

Me likey very much, very much indeed.

Expand full comment