World first has to deal with the popping of the Everything Bubble. This is global Bubble which was being inflated for decades. It seems like those in charge will try to institute a kind of post-Great-Reset matriarchy ruled by AI systems and their administrators, possibly climate activists and other new revolutionaries.
Other parts of the world might go the other way, toward industrialization under the guidance of China.
Whatever happens, there is no way to create anything like monarchy from scratch, which is the state of the world at the zero point of values. We are reaching the end of the bourgeois world, especially in the West. Any kind of renewal in the traditional sense of the word will be done by those who have not been affected by the bourgeois era and somehow kept the contact with the world of Tradition.
In the USA, we've had very little liberal democracy or republicanism for decades, really since the 1970s.
The USA used to have very imperfect and limited but nonetheless still genuinely democratic governance structures based around our two formerly decentralized and publicly accessible mass-member parties, each --while still being full of a lot of BS-- was for the most part honestly named, the Democratic Party was a small "d" democratic party and the Republican Party was a small "r" republican party. And they operated in a semi-politically decentralized, semi-economically decentralized, semi-culturally decentralized, and semi-scientifically decentralized system.
But for several decades now we've had two centralized and publicly in-accessible exclusionary membership parties. And our now so called Republican and Democratic parties are no longer republican and democratic parties, they are conservative party and a technocracy party, neither of which gives a flying **** about republicanism or democracy. And part parcel with that, they operate in a deeply politically, economically, and scientifically centralized system.
Gracias estimado Dugin por un ensayo totalizador y tan sencillo a la vez de ver y describir. Sólo el ojo occidental no puede verlo ni entenderlo desde su centralismo y miopía cultural.
In the USA, we've had very little liberal democracy or republicanism for decades, really since the 1970s.
The USA used to have very imperfect and limited but nonetheless still genuinely democratic governance structures based around our two formerly decentralized and publicly accessible mass-member parties, each --while still being full of a lot of BS-- was for the most part honestly named, the Democratic Party was a small "d" democratic party and the Republican Party was a small "r" republican party. And they operated in a semi-politically decentralized, semi-economically decentralized, semi-culturally decentralized, and semi-scientifically decentralized system.
But for several decades now we've had two centralized and publicly in-accessible exclusionary membership parties. And our now so called Republican and Democratic parties are no longer republican and democratic parties, they are conservative party and a technocracy party, neither of which gives a flying **** about republicanism or democracy. And part parcel with that, they operate in a deeply politically, economically, and scientifically centralized system.
“Most arguments are simply an effort to convince the other fellow that he might possibly have some error in his calculations, and the other fellow’s effort to convince you that you might have some error in your calculations, and your effort to convince the other fellow that you are not capable of having any error in your calculations, his effort to convince you that he has no possibility of error in any of his calculations."
“Now this is an argument. Here you have two certainties drastically opposed. Well, evaluation—that which knows more can evaluate more for the other one—has a tendency to reduce self‑determinism." L. Ron Hubbard
World first has to deal with the popping of the Everything Bubble. This is global Bubble which was being inflated for decades. It seems like those in charge will try to institute a kind of post-Great-Reset matriarchy ruled by AI systems and their administrators, possibly climate activists and other new revolutionaries.
Other parts of the world might go the other way, toward industrialization under the guidance of China.
Whatever happens, there is no way to create anything like monarchy from scratch, which is the state of the world at the zero point of values. We are reaching the end of the bourgeois world, especially in the West. Any kind of renewal in the traditional sense of the word will be done by those who have not been affected by the bourgeois era and somehow kept the contact with the world of Tradition.
In the USA, we've had very little liberal democracy or republicanism for decades, really since the 1970s.
The USA used to have very imperfect and limited but nonetheless still genuinely democratic governance structures based around our two formerly decentralized and publicly accessible mass-member parties, each --while still being full of a lot of BS-- was for the most part honestly named, the Democratic Party was a small "d" democratic party and the Republican Party was a small "r" republican party. And they operated in a semi-politically decentralized, semi-economically decentralized, semi-culturally decentralized, and semi-scientifically decentralized system.
But for several decades now we've had two centralized and publicly in-accessible exclusionary membership parties. And our now so called Republican and Democratic parties are no longer republican and democratic parties, they are conservative party and a technocracy party, neither of which gives a flying **** about republicanism or democracy. And part parcel with that, they operate in a deeply politically, economically, and scientifically centralized system.
Gracias estimado Dugin por un ensayo totalizador y tan sencillo a la vez de ver y describir. Sólo el ojo occidental no puede verlo ni entenderlo desde su centralismo y miopía cultural.
Dugin has beautifully summarized his books’ basic points.
You might like https://open.substack.com/pub/jeffrich/p/unlimited-empire-and-americas-unipolar?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=azb1g. I am inclined to interpret the liberal moment historically rather than philosophically
the prolates where daydreaming of Lollypops and Unicorns unaware of the Driving force within every child of Our creative father.
In the USA, we've had very little liberal democracy or republicanism for decades, really since the 1970s.
The USA used to have very imperfect and limited but nonetheless still genuinely democratic governance structures based around our two formerly decentralized and publicly accessible mass-member parties, each --while still being full of a lot of BS-- was for the most part honestly named, the Democratic Party was a small "d" democratic party and the Republican Party was a small "r" republican party. And they operated in a semi-politically decentralized, semi-economically decentralized, semi-culturally decentralized, and semi-scientifically decentralized system.
But for several decades now we've had two centralized and publicly in-accessible exclusionary membership parties. And our now so called Republican and Democratic parties are no longer republican and democratic parties, they are conservative party and a technocracy party, neither of which gives a flying **** about republicanism or democracy. And part parcel with that, they operate in a deeply politically, economically, and scientifically centralized system.
“Most arguments are simply an effort to convince the other fellow that he might possibly have some error in his calculations, and the other fellow’s effort to convince you that you might have some error in your calculations, and your effort to convince the other fellow that you are not capable of having any error in your calculations, his effort to convince you that he has no possibility of error in any of his calculations."
“Now this is an argument. Here you have two certainties drastically opposed. Well, evaluation—that which knows more can evaluate more for the other one—has a tendency to reduce self‑determinism." L. Ron Hubbard