I'm impressed that Joakim Andersen sees what so few people have noticed - that unlike nationalists in most countries, Irish nationalism and Sinn Fein have been on the left.
Ireland was one of the first Western European nations to recognize Lenin's government (which really should not be called a "Russian" government) and even in its ruined state after the civil war Ireland was the first country in Western Europe to float a loan to help Lenin consolidate his rule.
As shown by Sinn Fein's anti-white positions on many issues that Andersen highlights, Sinn Fein remains a leftist, marxist movement today.
This is something that Irish-Americans rarely know. As sentimental Irish nationalists they imagine that Sinn Fein is a Catholic movement.
Correct, they were ready to betray their own as soon as they got the chance. Really sad that the Irishmen never really had true representatives for the cause of their people.
Ireland has been a great tragedy. We English and Scots mishandled the Irish. A way should have been found for all 3 nations to be at peace with each other. They occupy the same island. It was logical that the English and Scots could not afford to have a base for hostile powers next to them. But to be fair to the Irish, they were mistreated. And, alas, they are crippled by resentment. Eventually, here in America many of them have become assimilated and have become sterling citizens. Nevertheless, their resentment initially led them to bring with them to America their grudges which they directed at their Anglo-Saxon neighbors. So much so that in an astonishing event that has been airbrushed out of American history, the Irish serving in the American army in our war with Mexico in 1848 mutinied and went over to the nonwhites who they saw as their brown Catholic friends sharing with them a mutual hatred of American Whites. They formed what they called "The St. Patrick Brigade" and fought as allies of the Mexicans for the remainder of the war.
Quando una élite cerca di soggiogare le classi meno abbienti ecco che si trasforma in un cancro che mina la sopravvivenza del Popolo indigeno attraverso la immigrazione di leve servibili solo allo sfruttamento.
You're wrong if you think that anti-integration voices in the states (eg pro-segregation) voices were "subaltern". Also, I'm embarrassed that you would use what might at first glance appear a marxist analysis to argue the racist cause of "Great replacement" which is a conspiracy.
Listen, there are indeed problems with over-immigration which need to be addressed, and the fact that we are importing people to do minimum wage labour (who are themselves the subaltern class, not the majority Irish), is itself a problem resulting from the fact that we do not pay workers enough to live up to the same standards as those of their parents. There are economic conditions which certainly make immigration more likely and which could be addressed by addressing crushing poverty. But you are mixing fact and fiction, and the great replacement is a fiction. If you want to do an economic analysis, do so, but don't argue that the solution is to stop importing labour, or that the imported labour is somehow conspiratorial.
The only conspiracy is that of capital, which conspires against the working class (which is most of the country). Capital is the root cause of the cost of living crisis and only socialism, or communism, will address these issues in a tangible real way. We can uplift everybody who lives in Ireland, immigrants and natives alike, if we work towards such a future. But to write rhetoric which aims to pit working class whites against working class immigrants only divides the labour force against itself, and does the work of Capital for it; by legitimizing its exploitation of both native and immigrant Irish.
Mind you, much of Ireland is already descended of settlers/immigrants from Britain, who are now considered native compared to the non-white newcomers.
Good analysis. Unfortunately, if it were possible to overcome the tyranny of liberal-Marxism exoterically, Europa's afflictions wouldn't exist in the first place.
I'm impressed that Joakim Andersen sees what so few people have noticed - that unlike nationalists in most countries, Irish nationalism and Sinn Fein have been on the left.
Ireland was one of the first Western European nations to recognize Lenin's government (which really should not be called a "Russian" government) and even in its ruined state after the civil war Ireland was the first country in Western Europe to float a loan to help Lenin consolidate his rule.
As shown by Sinn Fein's anti-white positions on many issues that Andersen highlights, Sinn Fein remains a leftist, marxist movement today.
This is something that Irish-Americans rarely know. As sentimental Irish nationalists they imagine that Sinn Fein is a Catholic movement.
Correct, they were ready to betray their own as soon as they got the chance. Really sad that the Irishmen never really had true representatives for the cause of their people.
Ireland has been a great tragedy. We English and Scots mishandled the Irish. A way should have been found for all 3 nations to be at peace with each other. They occupy the same island. It was logical that the English and Scots could not afford to have a base for hostile powers next to them. But to be fair to the Irish, they were mistreated. And, alas, they are crippled by resentment. Eventually, here in America many of them have become assimilated and have become sterling citizens. Nevertheless, their resentment initially led them to bring with them to America their grudges which they directed at their Anglo-Saxon neighbors. So much so that in an astonishing event that has been airbrushed out of American history, the Irish serving in the American army in our war with Mexico in 1848 mutinied and went over to the nonwhites who they saw as their brown Catholic friends sharing with them a mutual hatred of American Whites. They formed what they called "The St. Patrick Brigade" and fought as allies of the Mexicans for the remainder of the war.
Quando una élite cerca di soggiogare le classi meno abbienti ecco che si trasforma in un cancro che mina la sopravvivenza del Popolo indigeno attraverso la immigrazione di leve servibili solo allo sfruttamento.
“The aim of immigration was never that the immigrants should become Irish but that the Irish should become immigrants."
Damn.
You're wrong if you think that anti-integration voices in the states (eg pro-segregation) voices were "subaltern". Also, I'm embarrassed that you would use what might at first glance appear a marxist analysis to argue the racist cause of "Great replacement" which is a conspiracy.
Listen, there are indeed problems with over-immigration which need to be addressed, and the fact that we are importing people to do minimum wage labour (who are themselves the subaltern class, not the majority Irish), is itself a problem resulting from the fact that we do not pay workers enough to live up to the same standards as those of their parents. There are economic conditions which certainly make immigration more likely and which could be addressed by addressing crushing poverty. But you are mixing fact and fiction, and the great replacement is a fiction. If you want to do an economic analysis, do so, but don't argue that the solution is to stop importing labour, or that the imported labour is somehow conspiratorial.
The only conspiracy is that of capital, which conspires against the working class (which is most of the country). Capital is the root cause of the cost of living crisis and only socialism, or communism, will address these issues in a tangible real way. We can uplift everybody who lives in Ireland, immigrants and natives alike, if we work towards such a future. But to write rhetoric which aims to pit working class whites against working class immigrants only divides the labour force against itself, and does the work of Capital for it; by legitimizing its exploitation of both native and immigrant Irish.
Mind you, much of Ireland is already descended of settlers/immigrants from Britain, who are now considered native compared to the non-white newcomers.
If you actually read this far, thank you.
Good analysis. Unfortunately, if it were possible to overcome the tyranny of liberal-Marxism exoterically, Europa's afflictions wouldn't exist in the first place.