Now the situation is very different in Europe than the states. What I would do there is ride the momentum of anti Islam sentiments. They are the largest segment of migrants and Indians are their natural enemies. So even if we want the vast majority of all of them out, it’s best to take out the largest segment First using the others to support. Once Muslims are gone and all migration is stalled, then political Party percents will increasingly favor white self determination and the rest will be easy to relocate.
Who are you going to get to to do that and by what means? Sounds good to me but no politician would do so as of now that’s even imaginable at this point. Mestizos have too large of voting blocks and the swamp would just destroy any politician that tries. So sure I would say yeah let’s do it, as much as any other fantasy.
Cartels are imbedded across the nation. They control the gangs and clearly their corruption mirrors and goes hand in hand with western elites. Tell me how do you just deport them lol by legal means? Force is all that will work and there is only way save a complete collapse to acquire the force needed and it will include decimating cartels and the swamp to do so.
What you write is, alas, probably true enough. Let’s see what happens if Trump ends up winning and he follows up with his ostensible aim of mass deportation. I think Trump stands a good chance of losing because of his position on abortion and climate change.
Remigration is the only policy. We are being swamped by third world illegals. I would prefer to see an enforced remigration policy was adopted. We can no longer support illegals and give them welfare at the expense of White people
To begin we 🇺🇸 are absorbing Mexico 🇲🇽 and have begun our logical march South. Real Imperialism is an ugly, slow process. The current policy is Tiers below the elites and their 15% upper striver class supports absorb all the cost and suffering.
We’re absorbing Mexico much as the Romans expanded in Italy. Slowly, and once we became an Empire very logically inevitably.
So one can have all the policy dreams one wants, these policies require new elites, a new upper middle striver bureaucratic class, what you wish requires revolution and an enormous wave of human suffering. What you are getting at is essentially partition, you may want to look at India and Israel for what you’re getting into.
Because after this revolution you’ll need dictatorship, the only incentive that the mestizo here will respond to leave is force.
As it happens these things are coming to pass anyway, so here’s your chance.
The managerial class doesn’t support anything, the working and falling middle class does. We prop up the GDP in numerous ways of extracting subsidies for internationalism. The empire is the issue, it’s all monetary based and very soft policy. That top 15% doesn’t live among them.
Cartels are a major domestic issue. They are all over and exert a lot more power with human drug trafficking than most realize. It’s a win for us to take them out snd yes it would be a complete overhaul of the swamp… but not quite a civil war. Especially if it were actually made into a deal with Mexico and other states.
Most of the regular ones just want to extract money hence ending their ability to do so and giving them money to leave deals with that. The gangs are all tied to cartels, that will take overt force hence declaring them a terrorist organization allows our executive branch to take them out. You say this as if it’s not going to get bad otherwise… I’m not holding my breath, but it’s the last chance of a legal means to reversing this mess. Otherwise we are waiting for the implosion and would be wise to reroot to try to weather the insanity as we become South Africa.
Looking at the rather free ways the cartels are allowed to do business, banking, housing in the USA and only being savage in Mexico, almost as if clocking in at the Rio Grande but commuting from USA, looking at our history of relationships with Syrian Democracy, aka D’aesh IS, and the rest I get the definite vibe of a vendor relationship. So there’s that… your solution requires a policy change on the order of the Second Coming… or a Revolution.
Legal solution; the policy is always lawful. What do you see?
That is the policy.
You’re correct about the managerial class and elites.
You’re correct about the working class and non-elites.
If you wish a legal solution to policy, and really your solution is more on the lines of Diplomacy, we’re going to need some new Diplomats. They aren’t voted into office.
There’s no legal or electoral way to what you want even being possible as it requires a completely new government and top 15%. It requires the destruction of the NGOS in bed with the cartels.
Trump is bluster.
- as far as the Cartels leaving… a very lucrative market… they will as always be replaced. What you are calling Cartels has deep vendor and political relationships all the way through the NGOs and even the Churches and Charities.
Reversing a lucrative human migration with enormous support is not done in court rooms, nor ballot boxes.
As far as Imperialism and the efficient and cost effective path we’re on, eagerly embraced on both sides of the border , again see above, this is policy. As Imperialism goes it’s very cost effective, hands off , deniable. All the violence is done by instantly disposable thugs. As you note no one likes them… but they like their money.
You realize Human Trafficking is as big as drugs, and that it feeds not just business but the urban machines that just lost all their office workers and so tax base?
The new caseload justifies the budgets and income of how many bureaucrats?
Is it hopeless? No.
Is the solution through law?
Because people don’t care for the cartels?
No. That’s absurd, pardon me.
Now as it happens the Democratic Party and so the party of National government (regardless of any R one might mark) and all the National and International relationships of the New Deal are ending…. So the moment arrives anyway. The administrative state dies with the Democratic Party.
Now to the law; you must choose the law or civilization, indeed you must choose the law or survival.
The law you see has outlawed the rest of us, the bottom 80%.
It is tragic to invoke a religion that condemns you as born evil, to be extirpated by any means.
Yes there is high up corruption and I agree with what you are saying. They are savage here but in private, and mestizo control the gangs that have more ability to be savage publicly. Very much a vendor relationship with the swamp.
It would be a soft Revolution ie taking executive control because it really is a state of emergency. It’s legal but it doesn’t use law, but force. With this much of a cluster fek, we have a Gordian knot dynamic that the only way to untie it is by force. The only legal force is declaring a state of emergency and trying to clean house. It would be a softer form of civil war than if he tried to just expel people. Then they could wage an overt civil war on him. This is the only legal means of force that could possibly work…. And part of the reason for rerooting with local farm subsidies is to combat the financial issues. By localizing it helps basic needs even if it harms gdp since gdp is unnaturally inflated by subsidizing the shit out of international oligopolies. This and migration tax extraction and driving up cost of living is why basic needs inflate at a much accelerated rate compared to general inflation. So we don’t actually need to replace that 15% and can even rethink how we want the economy and government to function.
Legal doesn’t always mean policy, there are legal ways of taking force. Many people want trump to be able to. I doubt but hey why not throw out the most possible way he could. He has two options fight or build. To fight he would have to go all the way which I’m not sure he would be capable of it. This strategy would give him a legal means of starting the fight… might also shift popular opinion. Otherwise, he’s going to just build. In that case he will get conservatives to build the infrastructure the establishment uses in the next reactive swing back and forth in this globalist engine.
In a state of emergency, trump could act as diplomat. The point of what I put was using the state of emergency to drain the swamp, most of which is bureaucracy. Yes I agree he didn’t do much of anything… and many want him to be a Ceasar. Though I don’t think he is nor do I think he will do much. I figured why not give a workable idea if people want that. Believe me lol I’m way more into the idea of creating breakaway civilizations to stop upholding the system so it implodes faster.
When it doesn’t happen, people will lose sight of their last hope of a Ceasar which also helps to get them thinking more on the lines of what I call the great rerooting that I just mentioned. If you have read any of my work, you would know I find a lot of ills in litigation itself. The abstraction of state from rulership is a major issue.
I don’t think the administrative state will die with the Democratic Party. The party isn’t dying.
Yes and that economic exploitation can be cut off with reverse incentive to leave. Plus it gives us reason to hit the entire cartel network. Do you have any idea how much of them are here now? Cartel has taken over huge parts of California and local sheriffs won’t even do anything. They have strongholds across our entire nation. It’s a major security issue.
How about just deporting them? Let them absorb the cost.
Now the situation is very different in Europe than the states. What I would do there is ride the momentum of anti Islam sentiments. They are the largest segment of migrants and Indians are their natural enemies. So even if we want the vast majority of all of them out, it’s best to take out the largest segment First using the others to support. Once Muslims are gone and all migration is stalled, then political Party percents will increasingly favor white self determination and the rest will be easy to relocate.
Who are you going to get to to do that and by what means? Sounds good to me but no politician would do so as of now that’s even imaginable at this point. Mestizos have too large of voting blocks and the swamp would just destroy any politician that tries. So sure I would say yeah let’s do it, as much as any other fantasy.
Cartels are imbedded across the nation. They control the gangs and clearly their corruption mirrors and goes hand in hand with western elites. Tell me how do you just deport them lol by legal means? Force is all that will work and there is only way save a complete collapse to acquire the force needed and it will include decimating cartels and the swamp to do so.
What you write is, alas, probably true enough. Let’s see what happens if Trump ends up winning and he follows up with his ostensible aim of mass deportation. I think Trump stands a good chance of losing because of his position on abortion and climate change.
Remigration is the only policy. We are being swamped by third world illegals. I would prefer to see an enforced remigration policy was adopted. We can no longer support illegals and give them welfare at the expense of White people
To begin we 🇺🇸 are absorbing Mexico 🇲🇽 and have begun our logical march South. Real Imperialism is an ugly, slow process. The current policy is Tiers below the elites and their 15% upper striver class supports absorb all the cost and suffering.
We’re absorbing Mexico much as the Romans expanded in Italy. Slowly, and once we became an Empire very logically inevitably.
So one can have all the policy dreams one wants, these policies require new elites, a new upper middle striver bureaucratic class, what you wish requires revolution and an enormous wave of human suffering. What you are getting at is essentially partition, you may want to look at India and Israel for what you’re getting into.
Because after this revolution you’ll need dictatorship, the only incentive that the mestizo here will respond to leave is force.
As it happens these things are coming to pass anyway, so here’s your chance.
The managerial class doesn’t support anything, the working and falling middle class does. We prop up the GDP in numerous ways of extracting subsidies for internationalism. The empire is the issue, it’s all monetary based and very soft policy. That top 15% doesn’t live among them.
Cartels are a major domestic issue. They are all over and exert a lot more power with human drug trafficking than most realize. It’s a win for us to take them out snd yes it would be a complete overhaul of the swamp… but not quite a civil war. Especially if it were actually made into a deal with Mexico and other states.
Most of the regular ones just want to extract money hence ending their ability to do so and giving them money to leave deals with that. The gangs are all tied to cartels, that will take overt force hence declaring them a terrorist organization allows our executive branch to take them out. You say this as if it’s not going to get bad otherwise… I’m not holding my breath, but it’s the last chance of a legal means to reversing this mess. Otherwise we are waiting for the implosion and would be wise to reroot to try to weather the insanity as we become South Africa.
Well , thank for your answer.
Looking at the rather free ways the cartels are allowed to do business, banking, housing in the USA and only being savage in Mexico, almost as if clocking in at the Rio Grande but commuting from USA, looking at our history of relationships with Syrian Democracy, aka D’aesh IS, and the rest I get the definite vibe of a vendor relationship. So there’s that… your solution requires a policy change on the order of the Second Coming… or a Revolution.
Legal solution; the policy is always lawful. What do you see?
That is the policy.
You’re correct about the managerial class and elites.
You’re correct about the working class and non-elites.
If you wish a legal solution to policy, and really your solution is more on the lines of Diplomacy, we’re going to need some new Diplomats. They aren’t voted into office.
There’s no legal or electoral way to what you want even being possible as it requires a completely new government and top 15%. It requires the destruction of the NGOS in bed with the cartels.
Trump is bluster.
- as far as the Cartels leaving… a very lucrative market… they will as always be replaced. What you are calling Cartels has deep vendor and political relationships all the way through the NGOs and even the Churches and Charities.
Reversing a lucrative human migration with enormous support is not done in court rooms, nor ballot boxes.
As far as Imperialism and the efficient and cost effective path we’re on, eagerly embraced on both sides of the border , again see above, this is policy. As Imperialism goes it’s very cost effective, hands off , deniable. All the violence is done by instantly disposable thugs. As you note no one likes them… but they like their money.
You realize Human Trafficking is as big as drugs, and that it feeds not just business but the urban machines that just lost all their office workers and so tax base?
The new caseload justifies the budgets and income of how many bureaucrats?
Is it hopeless? No.
Is the solution through law?
Because people don’t care for the cartels?
No. That’s absurd, pardon me.
Now as it happens the Democratic Party and so the party of National government (regardless of any R one might mark) and all the National and International relationships of the New Deal are ending…. So the moment arrives anyway. The administrative state dies with the Democratic Party.
Now to the law; you must choose the law or civilization, indeed you must choose the law or survival.
The law you see has outlawed the rest of us, the bottom 80%.
It is tragic to invoke a religion that condemns you as born evil, to be extirpated by any means.
That is our situation.
That is our tragedy.
It need not be yours…
It will not be ours in the end.
Of course, I like discussion.
Yes there is high up corruption and I agree with what you are saying. They are savage here but in private, and mestizo control the gangs that have more ability to be savage publicly. Very much a vendor relationship with the swamp.
It would be a soft Revolution ie taking executive control because it really is a state of emergency. It’s legal but it doesn’t use law, but force. With this much of a cluster fek, we have a Gordian knot dynamic that the only way to untie it is by force. The only legal force is declaring a state of emergency and trying to clean house. It would be a softer form of civil war than if he tried to just expel people. Then they could wage an overt civil war on him. This is the only legal means of force that could possibly work…. And part of the reason for rerooting with local farm subsidies is to combat the financial issues. By localizing it helps basic needs even if it harms gdp since gdp is unnaturally inflated by subsidizing the shit out of international oligopolies. This and migration tax extraction and driving up cost of living is why basic needs inflate at a much accelerated rate compared to general inflation. So we don’t actually need to replace that 15% and can even rethink how we want the economy and government to function.
Legal doesn’t always mean policy, there are legal ways of taking force. Many people want trump to be able to. I doubt but hey why not throw out the most possible way he could. He has two options fight or build. To fight he would have to go all the way which I’m not sure he would be capable of it. This strategy would give him a legal means of starting the fight… might also shift popular opinion. Otherwise, he’s going to just build. In that case he will get conservatives to build the infrastructure the establishment uses in the next reactive swing back and forth in this globalist engine.
In a state of emergency, trump could act as diplomat. The point of what I put was using the state of emergency to drain the swamp, most of which is bureaucracy. Yes I agree he didn’t do much of anything… and many want him to be a Ceasar. Though I don’t think he is nor do I think he will do much. I figured why not give a workable idea if people want that. Believe me lol I’m way more into the idea of creating breakaway civilizations to stop upholding the system so it implodes faster.
When it doesn’t happen, people will lose sight of their last hope of a Ceasar which also helps to get them thinking more on the lines of what I call the great rerooting that I just mentioned. If you have read any of my work, you would know I find a lot of ills in litigation itself. The abstraction of state from rulership is a major issue.
I don’t think the administrative state will die with the Democratic Party. The party isn’t dying.
that is not how it works, people come to America shore with their prejudices to exploit nativity
Yes and that economic exploitation can be cut off with reverse incentive to leave. Plus it gives us reason to hit the entire cartel network. Do you have any idea how much of them are here now? Cartel has taken over huge parts of California and local sheriffs won’t even do anything. They have strongholds across our entire nation. It’s a major security issue.