Option 2) is simply the usual mode of operation of the post-national, global empire of capital.
Our new(ish) imperial masters have no real affinity with the people of the Third World, other than seeing them as useful pawns for boosting GDP in developed countries and corroding organised labour in the same places.
I must admit I've come around to the view that what's best is to cut all tied and support with the third world and to ignore them entirely. They hate us, so leave them be.
We're happier without them and them without us so let's just focus on building our nations up once more.
Golden rule is: don't listen to what the say, observe how they act. Let's have a look at the more so called "moderate" immigrants (because aside from a few die hards everyone is quite clear on how immigration from Africa and The Middle East is affecting western civ).
Chinese and Indians are gaming our systems completely. Tax evasions, spying, crashing the housing market, establishing ethnic towns, extreme nepotism (look at Indians and the IT-sector), illegal immigration, baby farms!, front operation for legal immigration (work recruiting) etc etc. They come from societies where gaming the system is a way of life due to heavy corruption (which itself is just an expression of cultural norms). The West is a sensitive ecosystem that relies on open debate, honesty and integrity and a belief in our superiors.
The part about Indians and Chinese ppl is highly exaggerated and only applies to the US (maybe Canada). It's different in Europe. You also ignore what both ethnic groups contribute to the US e.g. in scientific research (just one example). American academics would crumble without these groups.
But China would be happy if a 6 figure number of high potentials would return.
He is spot on. The system discourages whites from stem subjects. The mere fact science and maths faculties are packed full of Chinamen -who pay inflated tuition fees- is unnatural and alienating to our perspective scientists. But convenient to the bottom line of universities (which, legally, are charities)
The supposition that Chinese and Indians would act completely differently in Europe compared to their native lands and the United States is frankly laughable. The only reason it isn’t as excessive is due to numbers and probably stricter regulations. If they could, they would, and they will.
Constantin von Hoffmeister promotes a Bangladeshi shitposter pajeet scammer called Ahnaf ibn Qaif who publishes ChatPT-generated third worldist, islamist, Christophobic and leukophobic Al slop complete with emoji pukes.
And the Tree off Woe has ibn Qais as a ;o-contributor" of cringy slop.
Von Hoffmeister is also a cringe Nietszschean LARPer dreaming about a neofascist neopagan pan-European empire rather than the Sacrum Imperium Europaum, the Imperium Christianum aka the Christendom that Europe rightfully is.
Rehabilitation from Constantine Coalsmeister.
Vibe shift
Convenient timing, I'm not complaining though. The third worldism needed to go.
Arktos freed from Duganist Occupied Editor control, huzzah!
Out of the frying pan into the fires of moderate Fascism?
There are 2 3rd worldest positions.
1)Seize the means of production in obtaining seperate imperial spheres of influence. Multipolalaity*
2)1st world open borders policy in inviting the 3rd world in through mass migration. Unipolaity*
Option 2) is simply the usual mode of operation of the post-national, global empire of capital.
Our new(ish) imperial masters have no real affinity with the people of the Third World, other than seeing them as useful pawns for boosting GDP in developed countries and corroding organised labour in the same places.
I must admit I've come around to the view that what's best is to cut all tied and support with the third world and to ignore them entirely. They hate us, so leave them be.
We're happier without them and them without us so let's just focus on building our nations up once more.
Golden rule is: don't listen to what the say, observe how they act. Let's have a look at the more so called "moderate" immigrants (because aside from a few die hards everyone is quite clear on how immigration from Africa and The Middle East is affecting western civ).
Chinese and Indians are gaming our systems completely. Tax evasions, spying, crashing the housing market, establishing ethnic towns, extreme nepotism (look at Indians and the IT-sector), illegal immigration, baby farms!, front operation for legal immigration (work recruiting) etc etc. They come from societies where gaming the system is a way of life due to heavy corruption (which itself is just an expression of cultural norms). The West is a sensitive ecosystem that relies on open debate, honesty and integrity and a belief in our superiors.
The part about Indians and Chinese ppl is highly exaggerated and only applies to the US (maybe Canada). It's different in Europe. You also ignore what both ethnic groups contribute to the US e.g. in scientific research (just one example). American academics would crumble without these groups.
But China would be happy if a 6 figure number of high potentials would return.
He is spot on. The system discourages whites from stem subjects. The mere fact science and maths faculties are packed full of Chinamen -who pay inflated tuition fees- is unnatural and alienating to our perspective scientists. But convenient to the bottom line of universities (which, legally, are charities)
The supposition that Chinese and Indians would act completely differently in Europe compared to their native lands and the United States is frankly laughable. The only reason it isn’t as excessive is due to numbers and probably stricter regulations. If they could, they would, and they will.
Constantin von Hoffmeister promotes a Bangladeshi shitposter pajeet scammer called Ahnaf ibn Qaif who publishes ChatPT-generated third worldist, islamist, Christophobic and leukophobic Al slop complete with emoji pukes.
And the Tree off Woe has ibn Qais as a ;o-contributor" of cringy slop.
Von Hoffmeister is also a cringe Nietszschean LARPer dreaming about a neofascist neopagan pan-European empire rather than the Sacrum Imperium Europaum, the Imperium Christianum aka the Christendom that Europe rightfully is.
You obv don't know what “pajeet” means and you parrot an ethnic slur made up by 3rd world islamists from Pakistan.
And no, there is no Imperium Christianum and won't be one.
You had better bring back Von Hoffmeister. That article was vile.
Is what happened at ARKTOS similar to what happened at Veritas?
What part of it was bad?
What part of it was bad?
Thank you so much!
Quite informative.
Read years ago. Good article.
Excellent, will restack. Here's a look at the 'demographic dumping' in detail ...
https://futuredad.substack.com/p/futuredad-57-mass-immigration-is?r=59rk8t
"Hussein"